<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transformers sequel has too much action</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chick Flicks Suck</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-805267</link>
		<author>Chick Flicks Suck</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-805267</guid>
		<description>I have to say that there is no such thing as too much action. What I didn't like about the movie though was the two retarded "twin" robots. IMO, that totally "Jar Jar Binks'd" it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that there is no such thing as too much action. What I didn&#8217;t like about the movie though was the two retarded &#8220;twin&#8221; robots. IMO, that totally &#8220;Jar Jar Binks&#8217;d&#8221; it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804862</link>
		<author>Ed</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 05:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804862</guid>
		<description>I'm wondering if we should be expecting some of the same stuff when GI Joe comes out later this summer.  Shall we just make a review on the preview and save the money and time.  You could offer us a compare and contrast between the previews of Transformers and GI Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if we should be expecting some of the same stuff when GI Joe comes out later this summer.  Shall we just make a review on the preview and save the money and time.  You could offer us a compare and contrast between the previews of Transformers and GI Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804550</link>
		<author>Lestat</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804550</guid>
		<description>I haven't been to a movie in over a year, except for 1 at the budget seats. $9/ticket is getting a bit too pricey for me. But this one I had to see on the big screen.

I felt it was a bit long also. Thankfully the action kept me awake. Often times during the fights, the "camera" was too close and I couldn't make out who was who, and what they were punching.

The biggest disappointment was the twins. I understand they needed the characters to take the story where it went. But the whole Jar Jar Binks business was plain insulting. All the urban reach to get a laugh turned stupid.

I myself didn't dislike it as much as you. I would give it a C+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been to a movie in over a year, except for 1 at the budget seats. $9/ticket is getting a bit too pricey for me. But this one I had to see on the big screen.</p>
<p>I felt it was a bit long also. Thankfully the action kept me awake. Often times during the fights, the &#8220;camera&#8221; was too close and I couldn&#8217;t make out who was who, and what they were punching.</p>
<p>The biggest disappointment was the twins. I understand they needed the characters to take the story where it went. But the whole Jar Jar Binks business was plain insulting. All the urban reach to get a laugh turned stupid.</p>
<p>I myself didn&#8217;t dislike it as much as you. I would give it a C+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804406</link>
		<author>Rob O.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804406</guid>
		<description>Maybe you'll say I'm a generational elitist, but there's a huge lack of appreciation for quality movies with the Generation Y crowd.  They're overly-impressed with flashy CG, explosions, and hot babes.  I often hear comments from my Gen Y buds like, "That movie wasn't too bad." or "It wasn't as bad as I expected."  Think about that for a sec - these guys anticipated - expected - that the movie would suck, yet they still piddled their hard-earned cash on going to the theater to watch it.

It's that kind of undiscriminating, blind consumerism that feeds the Michael Bays, Jerry Bruckheimers, &#38; McGs (what kind of snot-nosed director can't be bothered to use his whole name anyway?) of the world.  I refuse to give my money to hacks who mine the lowest common-denominator with movies that feature only big tits, big explosions, and big eye-candy.  I enjoy fun movies too, but I demand a bit more than the tripe that we're mostly getting these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you&#8217;ll say I&#8217;m a generational elitist, but there&#8217;s a huge lack of appreciation for quality movies with the Generation Y crowd.  They&#8217;re overly-impressed with flashy CG, explosions, and hot babes.  I often hear comments from my Gen Y buds like, &#8220;That movie wasn&#8217;t too bad.&#8221; or &#8220;It wasn&#8217;t as bad as I expected.&#8221;  Think about that for a sec - these guys anticipated - expected - that the movie would suck, yet they still piddled their hard-earned cash on going to the theater to watch it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s that kind of undiscriminating, blind consumerism that feeds the Michael Bays, Jerry Bruckheimers, &amp; McGs (what kind of snot-nosed director can&#8217;t be bothered to use his whole name anyway?) of the world.  I refuse to give my money to hacks who mine the lowest common-denominator with movies that feature only big tits, big explosions, and big eye-candy.  I enjoy fun movies too, but I demand a bit more than the tripe that we&#8217;re mostly getting these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804402</link>
		<author>Bob</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804402</guid>
		<description>One of my friends called this the "best movie ever made", and I seriously slapped him right across the face.  It's pitiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my friends called this the &#8220;best movie ever made&#8221;, and I seriously slapped him right across the face.  It&#8217;s pitiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804364</link>
		<author>Rob O.</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804364</guid>
		<description>You've illustrated a point I was making to some colleagues a few weeks ago - the only potentially redeeming thing about Transformers 2 is jiggly Megan Fox and you can find loads of incredible pictures of her airbrushed self with Google for free.

Michael Bay picks up exactly where Jerry Bruckheimer leaves off - mindless CG fluff and and an almost complete lack of substance.  I like eye-candy as much - if not more - than most, but I've gotta have some actual storytelling along with it.  And none of that faux-plot crap that George Lucas is dishing out these days, taking a page from the J.J. Abrams playbook to introduce hyper-complicated subplots to compensate for massive semi-truck-sized holes in the main story line.  No sir, I need actual stories with characters I can really give a crap about (or truly despise, respectively).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve illustrated a point I was making to some colleagues a few weeks ago - the only potentially redeeming thing about Transformers 2 is jiggly Megan Fox and you can find loads of incredible pictures of her airbrushed self with Google for free.</p>
<p>Michael Bay picks up exactly where Jerry Bruckheimer leaves off - mindless CG fluff and and an almost complete lack of substance.  I like eye-candy as much - if not more - than most, but I&#8217;ve gotta have some actual storytelling along with it.  And none of that faux-plot crap that George Lucas is dishing out these days, taking a page from the J.J. Abrams playbook to introduce hyper-complicated subplots to compensate for massive semi-truck-sized holes in the main story line.  No sir, I need actual stories with characters I can really give a crap about (or truly despise, respectively).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cougar Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804361</link>
		<author>Cougar Woman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090703/5962/#comment-804361</guid>
		<description>I have not seen the movie yet and don't think I will bother, but have you noticed Megan's Adams Apple? Every time I see photos of her, or interviews, I think wow, she is beautiful, but then I notice this huge Adam's apple and it is really off putting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not seen the movie yet and don&#8217;t think I will bother, but have you noticed Megan&#8217;s Adams Apple? Every time I see photos of her, or interviews, I think wow, she is beautiful, but then I notice this huge Adam&#8217;s apple and it is really off putting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
