<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t send your readers temporary blog post trash</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-806138</link>
		<author>Simon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-806138</guid>
		<description>These useless blog posts are sometimes one of the results of 'earn money by blogging' category!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These useless blog posts are sometimes one of the results of &#8216;earn money by blogging&#8217; category!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802537</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802537</guid>
		<description>A way to prove ownership of a site is the add a CNAME rule in your DNS, pointing to the site that want to validate the owner identity.. You can do this on Google apps, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A way to prove ownership of a site is the add a CNAME rule in your DNS, pointing to the site that want to validate the owner identity.. You can do this on Google apps, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurtlar Vadisi</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802116</link>
		<author>Kurtlar Vadisi</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802116</guid>
		<description>In fact, I think that’s a feature of Google Reader, that it saves RSS posts even if they were deleted from the original feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I think that’s a feature of Google Reader, that it saves RSS posts even if they were deleted from the original feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Sonderversicherung</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802107</link>
		<author>April Sonderversicherung</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802107</guid>
		<description>About temporary blog posts, I find it stupid too because it shows up in reader's feed and anybody can read it.

@ delldell, same here, too! useless blog posts also annoys me. There are some blogs that seem interesting but when you get to read their posts, only one or two are meaningful, some posts are already useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About temporary blog posts, I find it stupid too because it shows up in reader&#8217;s feed and anybody can read it.</p>
<p>@ delldell, same here, too! useless blog posts also annoys me. There are some blogs that seem interesting but when you get to read their posts, only one or two are meaningful, some posts are already useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeet</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802028</link>
		<author>Jeet</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802028</guid>
		<description>There are many ways to prove ownership of blog / site including meta tags or image / file on the server. I haven't seen a system that uses 'tags / words' in genuine posts to establish ownership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many ways to prove ownership of blog / site including meta tags or image / file on the server. I haven&#8217;t seen a system that uses &#8216;tags / words&#8217; in genuine posts to establish ownership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802008</link>
		<author>Ravi</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802008</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly (since it's been a while since I've used WLW), it asks you about a temporary blog post, no mention about leaving something in your RSS feed.  In fact, I think that's a feature of Google Reader, that it saves RSS posts even if they were deleted from the original feed.

Annoying? Absolutely.  But I think it's on Microsoft to come up with a better way to detect your blog style (surely they can use the most recent post and detect it from there rather than having to create a brand new post?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly (since it&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve used WLW), it asks you about a temporary blog post, no mention about leaving something in your RSS feed.  In fact, I think that&#8217;s a feature of Google Reader, that it saves RSS posts even if they were deleted from the original feed.</p>
<p>Annoying? Absolutely.  But I think it&#8217;s on Microsoft to come up with a better way to detect your blog style (surely they can use the most recent post and detect it from there rather than having to create a brand new post?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802004</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802004</guid>
		<description>Well Ravi WLW does ask the author to confirm that this is OK to do before doing it, so the author at best isn't reading what they are confirming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Ravi WLW does ask the author to confirm that this is OK to do before doing it, so the author at best isn&#8217;t reading what they are confirming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delldell</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802001</link>
		<author>delldell</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802001</guid>
		<description>aside from these. useless blog posts also annoy me. i've unsubscribed from shoemoney and john chows blog because 4 out of 5 of their blog posts are useless. it seems like they post just for the post of posting something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aside from these. useless blog posts also annoy me. i&#8217;ve unsubscribed from shoemoney and john chows blog because 4 out of 5 of their blog posts are useless. it seems like they post just for the post of posting something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802000</link>
		<author>Ravi</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-802000</guid>
		<description>I don't think it's the authors' fault, I blame Windows Live Writer -- when I did this on my own blog, I had no idea it was going to leave a remnant in my RSS feed (only way I knew is because I subscribe to my own feed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the authors&#8217; fault, I blame Windows Live Writer &#8212; when I did this on my own blog, I had no idea it was going to leave a remnant in my RSS feed (only way I knew is because I subscribe to my own feed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-801998</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20090226/5892/#comment-801998</guid>
		<description>No, the pingbacks are from new (and usually legitimate) posts, Grog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the pingbacks are from new (and usually legitimate) posts, Grog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
