<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AI researcher predicts Massachusetts will approve robot marriages around 2050</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-700541</link>
		<author>paul</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-700541</guid>
		<description>i've been hearing about robotic sex since my college years.  it's not a new concept at all.  as for some decent level of AI, well that is going to take a long time.  It will be interesting to see what the next 20 years brings.  technology is moving so fast and yet, we can't conquer things like cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been hearing about robotic sex since my college years.  it&#8217;s not a new concept at all.  as for some decent level of AI, well that is going to take a long time.  It will be interesting to see what the next 20 years brings.  technology is moving so fast and yet, we can&#8217;t conquer things like cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695549</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695549</guid>
		<description>I don't think there is any part of the human body that will not be fully simulated at some point in the future, right down to the spit.  OTOH, the psycho-social cues may be much more difficult to program for.

Later, when they get the vote and hold public offices, they might start programming themselves for their own sexual preferences and leave us begging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is any part of the human body that will not be fully simulated at some point in the future, right down to the spit.  OTOH, the psycho-social cues may be much more difficult to program for.</p>
<p>Later, when they get the vote and hold public offices, they might start programming themselves for their own sexual preferences and leave us begging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695469</link>
		<author>Vince Williams</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695469</guid>
		<description>There are so many sensory variables in the sexual experience beyond simple mechanics. 

Some, like auditory cues, would be programmable, but what about smells, tastes, and tactile sensations?

How would you replicate those important parts of the sexual experience?

I would think it'd be very difficult to create a reasonable robot facsimile of kissing, for example. 

Even something as mundane as saliva has its role to play.

I'm thinking, gross as it may sound, that it would probably be technologically easier to re-animate human bodies à la Frankenstein's monster than to create a satisfactorily pleasurable robot surrogate.

Resurrecting brain activity might not even be necessary, since nerve impulses could be stimulated artificially, and would be programmable, I suppose.

That would open up a whole new Pandora's box of medical and ethical considerations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many sensory variables in the sexual experience beyond simple mechanics. </p>
<p>Some, like auditory cues, would be programmable, but what about smells, tastes, and tactile sensations?</p>
<p>How would you replicate those important parts of the sexual experience?</p>
<p>I would think it&#8217;d be very difficult to create a reasonable robot facsimile of kissing, for example. </p>
<p>Even something as mundane as saliva has its role to play.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking, gross as it may sound, that it would probably be technologically easier to re-animate human bodies à la Frankenstein&#8217;s monster than to create a satisfactorily pleasurable robot surrogate.</p>
<p>Resurrecting brain activity might not even be necessary, since nerve impulses could be stimulated artificially, and would be programmable, I suppose.</p>
<p>That would open up a whole new Pandora&#8217;s box of medical and ethical considerations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ^Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695352</link>
		<author>^Lestat</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 14:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-695352</guid>
		<description>Wait until they start shouting for equal rights...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until they start shouting for equal rights&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-693494</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-693494</guid>
		<description>I think robot sex will seem more weird the more sentient they become -- the more they become like us, the less we'll feel entitled to require their services whether they like it or not.  When we finally make the shift to considering them equals, then we'll also have to flirt with them first, buy them dinner, and wait to be asked to come in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think robot sex will seem more weird the more sentient they become &#8212; the more they become like us, the less we&#8217;ll feel entitled to require their services whether they like it or not.  When we finally make the shift to considering them equals, then we&#8217;ll also have to flirt with them first, buy them dinner, and wait to be asked to come in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690178</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690178</guid>
		<description>There are two problems with robots, Vince: memory and AI. The first problem will be gone much sooner than 40+ years. The second, artificial intelligence, I agree with you, is going to take much longer. Won't be in my lifetime, but I could conceive in my children's or their children's lifetimes.

AI has been an extremely tough nut to crack, but it is improving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two problems with robots, Vince: memory and AI. The first problem will be gone much sooner than 40+ years. The second, artificial intelligence, I agree with you, is going to take much longer. Won&#8217;t be in my lifetime, but I could conceive in my children&#8217;s or their children&#8217;s lifetimes.</p>
<p>AI has been an extremely tough nut to crack, but it is improving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690164</link>
		<author>Vince Williams</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690164</guid>
		<description>When most science fiction writers fifty years ago envisioned the earth fifty years in the future, they pictured a place completely unlike the earth in 1957, so radically 'evolved' as to be unrecognizable.

The reality of now is quite different from what they imagined-- except for the proliferation of sky scrapers in big cities like Shanghai-- most places look pretty much the same as they did then.

I expect that fifty years from now it will be the same with robots-- they'll be more human like, and people may even be having sex with them, but I doubt the sexual landscape will change that much.

I really don't think there's any danger of robots evolving 'desire', or any other emotion, and even the fanciest, most human-like sexbots would most likely be little more than technologically sophisticated blow up dolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When most science fiction writers fifty years ago envisioned the earth fifty years in the future, they pictured a place completely unlike the earth in 1957, so radically &#8216;evolved&#8217; as to be unrecognizable.</p>
<p>The reality of now is quite different from what they imagined&#8211; except for the proliferation of sky scrapers in big cities like Shanghai&#8211; most places look pretty much the same as they did then.</p>
<p>I expect that fifty years from now it will be the same with robots&#8211; they&#8217;ll be more human like, and people may even be having sex with them, but I doubt the sexual landscape will change that much.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any danger of robots evolving &#8216;desire&#8217;, or any other emotion, and even the fanciest, most human-like sexbots would most likely be little more than technologically sophisticated blow up dolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ^Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690121</link>
		<author>^Lestat</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20071221/5008/#comment-690121</guid>
		<description>Thats funny. I was reading somewhere that in Malaysia or something they &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3100143.stm" rel="nofollow"&gt;allow divorce via text message&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats funny. I was reading somewhere that in Malaysia or something they <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3100143.stm">allow divorce via text message</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
