<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with reader who regularly uses an ad blocker</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-796975</link>
		<author>Ben</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-796975</guid>
		<description>PS.  Why I was on here..... looking for a PDF Reader that doesn't have animation. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS.  Why I was on here&#8230;.. looking for a PDF Reader that doesn&#8217;t have animation. <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-796974</link>
		<author>Ben</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-796974</guid>
		<description>I hate distracting ads!!! If I could I would block it all.

When I'm on the internet, I'm looking for quality information.  NO MOUSEOVERS, NO ANIMATIONS OF ANY SORT!   

Since you implied that you wanted to know what we like or don't like in ads, I thought I'd voice my opinion. 

What I Like:
A magazine type experience.  Small fixed Ad is OK.  NO FLASHING! NO ANIMATION! Not one that's distracting from the article I'm trying to read. Soft round corners  on the boxes, just like news print.  I'm not that old.  I'm middle aged.  I am a computer professional and have been in the information technology arena for 15+ years.  I surf the net DAILY and have for years. Programming, Database Administrator, Systems Analyst, you name it, I've done it.  I understand revenue streams, technology, and sweet spots.  That is, simplicity vs. functionality, vs revenue. etc.

I came across your site, and started to read it, not get this.  I didn't start reading it because I needed the article but because there were no animations. Save that blasted mouseover. If i want to go there I know how to 'click' the mouse.  If it requires a mouseover, then its not self explanatory enough i.e. the layout is too complicated.

Also there are ads that take over the page.  These ads prevent me from shrinking the screen over the ad so the words of the article can be read without distraction. The article will shrink from 9 inches wide to 1 inch or less wide while the ad stays in the picture.

I have to use my task manager set to 'always on top' to cover up the ad so the color and animations will not distract my reading of the black and white article.  This is after I've read the ad and know that I'm not interested in it in any way. Still its distracting, hence the cover up.

Honestly, if you have good material... all that flashy stuff is just not necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate distracting ads!!! If I could I would block it all.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m on the internet, I&#8217;m looking for quality information.  NO MOUSEOVERS, NO ANIMATIONS OF ANY SORT!   </p>
<p>Since you implied that you wanted to know what we like or don&#8217;t like in ads, I thought I&#8217;d voice my opinion. </p>
<p>What I Like:<br />
A magazine type experience.  Small fixed Ad is OK.  NO FLASHING! NO ANIMATION! Not one that&#8217;s distracting from the article I&#8217;m trying to read. Soft round corners  on the boxes, just like news print.  I&#8217;m not that old.  I&#8217;m middle aged.  I am a computer professional and have been in the information technology arena for 15+ years.  I surf the net DAILY and have for years. Programming, Database Administrator, Systems Analyst, you name it, I&#8217;ve done it.  I understand revenue streams, technology, and sweet spots.  That is, simplicity vs. functionality, vs revenue. etc.</p>
<p>I came across your site, and started to read it, not get this.  I didn&#8217;t start reading it because I needed the article but because there were no animations. Save that blasted mouseover. If i want to go there I know how to &#8216;click&#8217; the mouse.  If it requires a mouseover, then its not self explanatory enough i.e. the layout is too complicated.</p>
<p>Also there are ads that take over the page.  These ads prevent me from shrinking the screen over the ad so the words of the article can be read without distraction. The article will shrink from 9 inches wide to 1 inch or less wide while the ad stays in the picture.</p>
<p>I have to use my task manager set to &#8216;always on top&#8217; to cover up the ad so the color and animations will not distract my reading of the black and white article.  This is after I&#8217;ve read the ad and know that I&#8217;m not interested in it in any way. Still its distracting, hence the cover up.</p>
<p>Honestly, if you have good material&#8230; all that flashy stuff is just not necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quintius</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-643163</link>
		<author>Quintius</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-643163</guid>
		<description>I usually read your RSS feed, so I don't get the ads anyway.

I personally don't use ad blocking software although I:
a) use Flashblock, so I don't, by default, see content or ads that are Flash
b) toss the occasional entry in my hosts file to block ads that annoy me (e.g. 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net)

Regarding ads, I rarely click on them because I skim a lot and don't even see them. And besides, I'm frugal and wouldn't buy anyway, so why click (unless I'm in the occasional mood to support the website, then I'll click on a few)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually read your RSS feed, so I don&#8217;t get the ads anyway.</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t use ad blocking software although I:<br />
a) use Flashblock, so I don&#8217;t, by default, see content or ads that are Flash<br />
b) toss the occasional entry in my hosts file to block ads that annoy me (e.g. 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net)</p>
<p>Regarding ads, I rarely click on them because I skim a lot and don&#8217;t even see them. And besides, I&#8217;m frugal and wouldn&#8217;t buy anyway, so why click (unless I&#8217;m in the occasional mood to support the website, then I&#8217;ll click on a few)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-636621</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-636621</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed feedback again, Slevi. You leave quality comments, again, I appreciate and respect that.

On one hand I'm glad you didn't see the ads, but the other helps to confirm my belief that they are toned down perhaps a little too much in certain cases :) 

These days on blogs I think the ads work better with search engine visitors which currently comprise over 55% of the traffic here. While I won't get into specific financial numbers, SE traffic here is &lt;i&gt;very&lt;/i&gt; ad click friendly. These results fuel my interest in spending time developing something more length-wise between articles and blog posts. The less detailed posts have limited lifespan and usefulness on multiple levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed feedback again, Slevi. You leave quality comments, again, I appreciate and respect that.</p>
<p>On one hand I&#8217;m glad you didn&#8217;t see the ads, but the other helps to confirm my belief that they are toned down perhaps a little too much in certain cases <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>These days on blogs I think the ads work better with search engine visitors which currently comprise over 55% of the traffic here. While I won&#8217;t get into specific financial numbers, SE traffic here is <i>very</i> ad click friendly. These results fuel my interest in spending time developing something more length-wise between articles and blog posts. The less detailed posts have limited lifespan and usefulness on multiple levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slevi</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-636614</link>
		<author>Slevi</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-636614</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, bit long but did give a good view on how many people think. I must say that even if I came across your blog before and gave some comments earlier today as well I totally didn't notice the ads either. No ad blocking software here but just a general blindness for headers and sidebars, with them usually stuff with ads and quite useless widgets I've started to ignore them completely and solely rely on the content and footer which neither hold any ads.

With ads being placed all over the web though I'm not surprised if it's only going to become harder and harder to actually get clicks through ads. Myself I've recently added some ads again to my blog to see if with more visitors I'd actually be getting more clicks now compared to last year but so far it's not looking good either.

I'm not sure how much money you currently make through ads though, but PayPerPost isn't too bad of an option once you hit pr 5 or 6. Although compared to the shitty ops which there are available for me, I suppose the standard becomes higher as your blog becomes bigger as well. Every now and then though there are a bunch of $25+ ops available for pr5+ blogs, and rather than blatant credit card spam they actually come with some sort of subject from what I've seen.

The big buttons in the sidebar are optional, the only downside of course to payperpost is that it is a lot more invasive than text advertisements or something because it actually becomes part of your content. Whether that is worth it or not depends on how much money you'd make through the other ads I'd say, if they would give you more than what you think you'd make on a monthly basis with payperpost you'd have a direct answer and otherwise it might be something to think about.

Looking at things realistically though with the massive amount of blogs and sites in general present these days I personally think the entire concept of making money through the net is becoming less and less reachable, the competition is just so high it either plays out on luck or having to invest a lot to begin with even getting something back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, bit long but did give a good view on how many people think. I must say that even if I came across your blog before and gave some comments earlier today as well I totally didn&#8217;t notice the ads either. No ad blocking software here but just a general blindness for headers and sidebars, with them usually stuff with ads and quite useless widgets I&#8217;ve started to ignore them completely and solely rely on the content and footer which neither hold any ads.</p>
<p>With ads being placed all over the web though I&#8217;m not surprised if it&#8217;s only going to become harder and harder to actually get clicks through ads. Myself I&#8217;ve recently added some ads again to my blog to see if with more visitors I&#8217;d actually be getting more clicks now compared to last year but so far it&#8217;s not looking good either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how much money you currently make through ads though, but PayPerPost isn&#8217;t too bad of an option once you hit pr 5 or 6. Although compared to the shitty ops which there are available for me, I suppose the standard becomes higher as your blog becomes bigger as well. Every now and then though there are a bunch of $25+ ops available for pr5+ blogs, and rather than blatant credit card spam they actually come with some sort of subject from what I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>The big buttons in the sidebar are optional, the only downside of course to payperpost is that it is a lot more invasive than text advertisements or something because it actually becomes part of your content. Whether that is worth it or not depends on how much money you&#8217;d make through the other ads I&#8217;d say, if they would give you more than what you think you&#8217;d make on a monthly basis with payperpost you&#8217;d have a direct answer and otherwise it might be something to think about.</p>
<p>Looking at things realistically though with the massive amount of blogs and sites in general present these days I personally think the entire concept of making money through the net is becoming less and less reachable, the competition is just so high it either plays out on luck or having to invest a lot to begin with even getting something back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-634993</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-634993</guid>
		<description>Thanks Maggie, now how does that apply to the interview and discussion above? Your comment seems mechanized ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Maggie, now how does that apply to the interview and discussion above? Your comment seems mechanized &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-634946</link>
		<author>Maggie Stone</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070914/4798/#comment-634946</guid>
		<description>One of the more interesting analyses of the Adblock Plus/ Firefox blocking controversy is that it is, in itself, simply a method of generating links and traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more interesting analyses of the Adblock Plus/ Firefox blocking controversy is that it is, in itself, simply a method of generating links and traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
