<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bet against YouTube of Live video site</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: 11 months for GOOG to reach $600, while Adcenter moves like molasses &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-641197</link>
		<author>11 months for GOOG to reach $600, while Adcenter moves like molasses &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-641197</guid>
		<description>[...] of potentially major events working against Google right now. The uncertainty surrounding the Viacom billion dollar lawsuit at the forefront. If they can emerge from that lawsuit unscathed and continue to dominant search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of potentially major events working against Google right now. The uncertainty surrounding the Viacom billion dollar lawsuit at the forefront. If they can emerge from that lawsuit unscathed and continue to dominant search [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595257</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595257</guid>
		<description>No Chris, I'm saying that the major reason YouTube was/is popular was/is &lt;b&gt;because of copyright infringing content&lt;/b&gt; (do you disagree?) and EDTV-type live content doesn't have the same interest level. That type of content has niche appeal, at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Chris, I&#8217;m saying that the major reason YouTube was/is popular was/is <b>because of copyright infringing content</b> (do you disagree?) and EDTV-type live content doesn&#8217;t have the same interest level. That type of content has niche appeal, at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pirillo</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595253</link>
		<author>Chris Pirillo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595253</guid>
		<description>"...but the whole Ed TV thing has nowhere close to the legs of sharing clips of copyrighted content or low-quality bootlegged camera phone concert videos..." - you're talking about different types of consumption models. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;but the whole Ed TV thing has nowhere close to the legs of sharing clips of copyrighted content or low-quality bootlegged camera phone concert videos&#8230;&#8221; - you&#8217;re talking about different types of consumption models. <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595159</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595159</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris - thanks for stopping by. 

What exactly don't I get? As I wrote you're a popular "geek", you certainly aren't Paris Hilton popular. Relativity mon. The point is that there are tons more people clamoring for bootlegged copies of The Simple Life than anything being done on Justin.TV or uStream.TV no matter if it's amateur content or not. In order for a Live video site to have as much interest as YouTube has had the content is going to have to be something people want to pay for which isn't there now nor 10 years ago unless we're talking about adult content. Are you disputing this or some other point? Would be interested in hearing your enlightened perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris - thanks for stopping by. </p>
<p>What exactly don&#8217;t I get? As I wrote you&#8217;re a popular &#8220;geek&#8221;, you certainly aren&#8217;t Paris Hilton popular. Relativity mon. The point is that there are tons more people clamoring for bootlegged copies of The Simple Life than anything being done on Justin.TV or uStream.TV no matter if it&#8217;s amateur content or not. In order for a Live video site to have as much interest as YouTube has had the content is going to have to be something people want to pay for which isn&#8217;t there now nor 10 years ago unless we&#8217;re talking about adult content. Are you disputing this or some other point? Would be interested in hearing your enlightened perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pirillo</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595157</link>
		<author>Chris Pirillo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070622/4596/#comment-595157</guid>
		<description>You get it, and yet... don't. :)

First, I'm not all that popular - and second, I don't know who is claiming that Live video is anything new? It's not new - it's just finally accessible for people who don't have million-dollar (or even thousand-dollar) budgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You get it, and yet&#8230; don&#8217;t. <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>First, I&#8217;m not all that popular - and second, I don&#8217;t know who is claiming that Live video is anything new? It&#8217;s not new - it&#8217;s just finally accessible for people who don&#8217;t have million-dollar (or even thousand-dollar) budgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
