<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody scores well but Google the worst according to controversial report</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: darkmoon</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593918</link>
		<author>darkmoon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593918</guid>
		<description>I agree.  YouTube doesn't have a place to report copyright violations.  I found like Prince of Tennis episodes and other type things on there.   I was like.. wait....  you can't have this stuff on here.  But there's like no easy way to do it.  I'm not about to sit around and go, these people are in violation via email.  Screw that.  I'll click a link so they can check it, but I'm not going to hunt for it.   I'd be more worried about copyright violations also, than this privacy stuff.  Google is a-okay in my book right now as far as privacy is concerned.  Maybe that's change later, but so far it's been good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  YouTube doesn&#8217;t have a place to report copyright violations.  I found like Prince of Tennis episodes and other type things on there.   I was like.. wait&#8230;.  you can&#8217;t have this stuff on here.  But there&#8217;s like no easy way to do it.  I&#8217;m not about to sit around and go, these people are in violation via email.  Screw that.  I&#8217;ll click a link so they can check it, but I&#8217;m not going to hunt for it.   I&#8217;d be more worried about copyright violations also, than this privacy stuff.  Google is a-okay in my book right now as far as privacy is concerned.  Maybe that&#8217;s change later, but so far it&#8217;s been good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593916</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593916</guid>
		<description>Maybe just me darkmoon, but I'm more worried about YouTube copyright violations and Hollywood than Google privacy at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe just me darkmoon, but I&#8217;m more worried about YouTube copyright violations and Hollywood than Google privacy at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkmoon</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593914</link>
		<author>darkmoon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070611/4571/#comment-593914</guid>
		<description>I personally think that Matt Cutts is right.  This is reputation through mud dragging type stuff.  When you look at such things, then you have to take into account the fact that Google has made a stance and they've been very open with it.  In fact, Yahoo has too, yet they're also currently in a civil lawsuit that said they complied with the Chinese government but didn't protect their users' rights (Chinese activist has been jailed for ten years).

Privacy International seems to have a wishy washy report since it sounds like they half-hearted the research.   When it comes to privacy, all of the corporations seemed to have failed in some way, shape or form.  In fact, judging by what Google has done in the past, I actually believe that they're the only ones that have not only fought against the DoJ requests, but they haven't given up anything and kept it to themselves.   Wouldn't that justify them as being the best of the worst, and not the worst of the worst?  Sounds like there's a lot of screwy science there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that Matt Cutts is right.  This is reputation through mud dragging type stuff.  When you look at such things, then you have to take into account the fact that Google has made a stance and they&#8217;ve been very open with it.  In fact, Yahoo has too, yet they&#8217;re also currently in a civil lawsuit that said they complied with the Chinese government but didn&#8217;t protect their users&#8217; rights (Chinese activist has been jailed for ten years).</p>
<p>Privacy International seems to have a wishy washy report since it sounds like they half-hearted the research.   When it comes to privacy, all of the corporations seemed to have failed in some way, shape or form.  In fact, judging by what Google has done in the past, I actually believe that they&#8217;re the only ones that have not only fought against the DoJ requests, but they haven&#8217;t given up anything and kept it to themselves.   Wouldn&#8217;t that justify them as being the best of the worst, and not the worst of the worst?  Sounds like there&#8217;s a lot of screwy science there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
