<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blinded by the (red) light</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Trying to get into that Concert Groove &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-422488</link>
		<author>Trying to get into that Concert Groove &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 17:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-422488</guid>
		<description>[...] Site design, content, ads, features and page loading speeds Think Coca Cola. Red and white with a tinge of gold are the chosen colors for CG with a bit too much emphasis on red. Personally, I prefer red be used sparingly in site designs. Red is hard on the eyes especially against a white background and when it comes to reading I take away points from sites who lean too heavily on red. It&#8217;s definitely not gaudy as this abominable design, but I wish CG had chosen a little softer secondary color than red. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Site design, content, ads, features and page loading speeds Think Coca Cola. Red and white with a tinge of gold are the chosen colors for CG with a bit too much emphasis on red. Personally, I prefer red be used sparingly in site designs. Red is hard on the eyes especially against a white background and when it comes to reading I take away points from sites who lean too heavily on red. It&#8217;s definitely not gaudy as this abominable design, but I wish CG had chosen a little softer secondary color than red. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-388327</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-388327</guid>
		<description>Actually, we have a design where those links would be active, but since we have over 50 categories (and the major ones are listed on the right) that's more like a subtitle than intended to be something clickable. Your personal insults, overuse of the exclamation point, misspelling and anonymous cowardice aside, as far as &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; site's usability goes (not quite the topic, but whatever) that's a fair point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we have a design where those links would be active, but since we have over 50 categories (and the major ones are listed on the right) that&#8217;s more like a subtitle than intended to be something clickable. Your personal insults, overuse of the exclamation point, misspelling and anonymous cowardice aside, as far as <i>this</i> site&#8217;s usability goes (not quite the topic, but whatever) that&#8217;s a fair point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irrelevantanon</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-388309</link>
		<author>irrelevantanon</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20070114/4140/#comment-388309</guid>
		<description>wtf that design is way cooler than urs u blind eyes fool
go to specsavers, get ur eyes tested retard
hmm.... ur sites suck the tech vid music links in the top arent even links 
wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wtf that design is way cooler than urs u blind eyes fool<br />
go to specsavers, get ur eyes tested retard<br />
hmm&#8230;. ur sites suck the tech vid music links in the top arent even links<br />
wtf!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
