<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Search Engine Marketing Glossary</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061219/4058/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: namewithheld</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061219/4058/#comment-379761</link>
		<author>namewithheld</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061219/4058/#comment-379761</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;move the glossary to another domain, perhaps a .org. I realize this advice goes against the underlying marketing of his book which pays the bills, but if the goal for the glossary is to promote natural linking and use from people wanting to learn more from the search engine marketing terms I think it would be more likely linked as a standalone resource.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

An echo of my own thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>move the glossary to another domain, perhaps a .org. I realize this advice goes against the underlying marketing of his book which pays the bills, but if the goal for the glossary is to promote natural linking and use from people wanting to learn more from the search engine marketing terms I think it would be more likely linked as a standalone resource.</p></blockquote>
<p>An echo of my own thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
