<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 reasons Microsoft will *not* acquire Yahoo in 2007, one reason they might</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-717260</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-717260</guid>
		<description>Maverick - they didn't acquire Yahoo in &lt;b&gt;2007&lt;/b&gt; so no words to eat :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maverick - they didn&#8217;t acquire Yahoo in <b>2007</b> so no words to eat <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maverick</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-716943</link>
		<author>Maverick</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 04:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-716943</guid>
		<description>Woah - eat them words!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah - eat them words!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eBay is the one to watch, not Microsoft, in Yahoo! acquisition &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-555791</link>
		<author>eBay is the one to watch, not Microsoft, in Yahoo! acquisition &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-555791</guid>
		<description>[...] I haven&#8217;t changed my position one iota from my post in December 2006 offering 10 reasons Microsoft will *not* acquire Yahoo in 2007, one reason they might. The only reason they should buy Yahoo is an offensive move to keep Yahoo out of Google&#8217;s clutches (and yes, disclaimer time: I still own Google stock too). Pay special attention to #5 where I wrote that Microsoft should buy StumbleUpon. Why? Because that&#8217;s a tool being used by countless geeks to promote content to sites like digg, Reddit and others. It&#8217;s an easy and relatively inexpensive ticket to the party. But eBay pulled the trigger before Microsoft on that deal. I&#8217;m not even sure they attended that party which says something in and of itself. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I haven&#8217;t changed my position one iota from my post in December 2006 offering 10 reasons Microsoft will *not* acquire Yahoo in 2007, one reason they might. The only reason they should buy Yahoo is an offensive move to keep Yahoo out of Google&#8217;s clutches (and yes, disclaimer time: I still own Google stock too). Pay special attention to #5 where I wrote that Microsoft should buy StumbleUpon. Why? Because that&#8217;s a tool being used by countless geeks to promote content to sites like digg, Reddit and others. It&#8217;s an easy and relatively inexpensive ticket to the party. But eBay pulled the trigger before Microsoft on that deal. I&#8217;m not even sure they attended that party which says something in and of itself. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hello World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS Yahoo Live</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-555690</link>
		<author>Hello World &#187; Blog Archive &#187; MS Yahoo Live</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 14:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-555690</guid>
		<description>[...] Oh boy. I just realized I might end up using Microsoft MSN Live Flickr. Scary thought. Well, in that case I&#8217;d like to direct the MS executives reading this post to here&#160;: ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Oh boy. I just realized I might end up using Microsoft MSN Live Flickr. Scary thought. Well, in that case I&#8217;d like to direct the MS executives reading this post to here&nbsp;: ) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s money looked better than Microsoft in DoubleClick bidding &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-519971</link>
		<author>Google&#8217;s money looked better than Microsoft in DoubleClick bidding &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-519971</guid>
		<description>[...] Maybe this puts Yahoo back on the table? If this DoubleClick deal goes through I don&#8217;t think Microsoft will get outbid by Google on a Yahoo acquisition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Maybe this puts Yahoo back on the table? If this DoubleClick deal goes through I don&#8217;t think Microsoft will get outbid by Google on a Yahoo acquisition. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s the Season of Merger Speculations at Orbit Change Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-470461</link>
		<author>It’s the Season of Merger Speculations at Orbit Change Conversations</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-470461</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft + Yahoo. Jeremy Schoemaker broached this in mid-Dec listing 10 reasons why MS will acquire Yahoo in 2007. Basically he suggests that this is the only way for the two of them to compete with Google. While the speculation has remained alive, not everybody buys into the idea. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Microsoft + Yahoo. Jeremy Schoemaker broached this in mid-Dec listing 10 reasons why MS will acquire Yahoo in 2007. Basically he suggests that this is the only way for the two of them to compete with Google. While the speculation has remained alive, not everybody buys into the idea. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music, Yahoo, Microsoft, and more &#171; Sparks Team Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-367741</link>
		<author>Music, Yahoo, Microsoft, and more &#171; Sparks Team Blog</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-367741</guid>
		<description>[...] On the topic of Google, do you think Microsoft will acquire Yahoo next year? I really hope they don&#8217;t. But the way Yahoo! has been doing lately, it does seem possible. And Microsoft has already tried once this year. What do you think? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] On the topic of Google, do you think Microsoft will acquire Yahoo next year? I really hope they don&#8217;t. But the way Yahoo! has been doing lately, it does seem possible. And Microsoft has already tried once this year. What do you think? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft new facelift, Digg adds video and podcast features &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-366552</link>
		<author>Microsoft new facelift, Digg adds video and podcast features &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061218/4055/#comment-366552</guid>
		<description>[...] Broken digg images everywhere during update Curious sidenote: when Digg went down to implement this new site version they broke their digg count image for every third party site, including this one, which can be seen clearly in the image featured in my last post. I wonder why they didn&#8217;t at least use that image space to produce a static image to return during the update? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Broken digg images everywhere during update Curious sidenote: when Digg went down to implement this new site version they broke their digg count image for every third party site, including this one, which can be seen clearly in the image featured in my last post. I wonder why they didn&#8217;t at least use that image space to produce a static image to return during the update? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
