Yahconfoosed! |
Besides the two game systems launching over the weekend the other big story was a supposedly leaked internal Yahoo memo by Brad Garlinghouse and published by the Wall Street Journal (subscription required, sorry. Update: Paul Kedrosky reposts the memo that he said was being “forwarded all over the place.”).
Larry Dignan smells BS on the leakage aspect:
The Journal got the memo because it’s the business paper of record (and a damn good one at that). It’s called reporting and brand credibility that has taken decades to build. If you’re a CEO–or any exec–looking to float a memo you are going to the Journal. It’s your first stop to reach the folks that control your market cap. Sorry new media, old media has clout.
All I could do was shake my head after reading the memo and the various blog and media reactions. As a Yahoo shareholder, I’m embarassed by the company’s efforts in 2006. I was excited by what they did in 2005 and really thought they were on their way to doing some exciting things, but can’t voice my displeasure enough about what’s happened to date in 2006, beginning with the whole we don’t need to be #1 in search debacle.
At the present Yahoo seems like a very disjointed, disorganized, confused company. Sure, they have some smart people there but the disconnect between management and the workforce — at least to a complete outsider — seems to be almost incalculable. Outspoken employee insiders like Jeremy Zawodny seem to have gone quiet (last post over a week ago, maybe he’s on vacation?) regarding the substance of the memo which also calls for a reduction of the workforce and combining or eliminating competing products (Examples: MyWeb vs. Del.icio.us, Yahoo Photos vs. Flickr).
A bad case of Yahooitis has hit the Yahooligans. Let’s hope the holidays bring something other than coal in shareholder’s stockings. Draw a squiggly line at the top of paper toward the bottom and you’ll see what the performance has been like in 2006.
Update 10:47am PST: Greg Yardley offers some advice for Yahoo employees:
If you leave on your own, you can always take the high road and claim you were disgusted with the overall direction of the company. If you wait until you’re laid off, you’re going to get labeled as one of the employees who were “phoning it in, lacking the passion and commitment to be a part of the solution.” That’s one hell of a risk to take if you’re not sure if you’re staying or going.
Update 11/27/2006 7:52pm PST: Jeremy Zawodny stopped by to point out that he did post about the corrosive Peanut Butter memo on/about the same time that I posted this. You’ll see the link in comment #2 below, which sort of breaks his silence on the matter.
Related Posts- Pinging Yahoo
- Yahoo Personal Blog Guidelines 1.0
- Microsoft #42 out of 100 best companies to work for, Google ineligible
- Blogger fired for big mouth or blogging, you decide
- Wal-Mart memo seeks to discourage unhealthy job applicants
- Sourceforge inadvertently blocking Yahoo spiders?




[…] Perhaps just me, but why does this deal — piggybacking on what I wrote Monday on the allegedly leaked internal Yahoo memo — all feel like a part of some throw at the wall and see what sticks scheme? […]
Pingback by Yahoo courts Newspapers with ad and content deal, also forms alliance with answers.com » Make You Go Hmm — November 22, 2006 @ 9:25 am PST
Huh? Did I not write this: http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/008005.html
Jeremy
Comment by Jeremy Zawodny — November 27, 2006 @ 10:36 pm PST
Sorry, that post of yours was made about the same time or after this post (note date/time) and doesn’t really say anything, Jeremy
This quote from you in your post: “Brad is very right about some things and terribly wrong about others.”
What are you now, the riddler? LOL. Feel free to come back when you’ve actually written something on the subject with some meat and I’ll be happy to write an addendum.
The last post before that one? November 13.
Comment by TDavid — November 27, 2006 @ 10:51 pm PST