<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Create a Google coop custom search and connect to an Adsense account</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Putch</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-327054</link>
		<author>Putch</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-327054</guid>
		<description>TDavid- Understood. Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDavid- Understood. Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-327018</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-327018</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the persoalized follow-up, Putch. I'm cool with the original post, it just struck me negatively when after approving it I saw the exact same (promotional) comment elsewhere. With all due respect, if you want to plant seeds you probably should take the extra thirty seconds and switch up the text in future messages of that type nature. If you want to get personal feedback and participation you start by being personal, not mass mailish, that's all I'm saying. I asked for examples and was interested to see yours and then it made me feel like I got duped when I saw the same comment completely unpersonalized elsewhere.

Best of luck with your project :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the persoalized follow-up, Putch. I&#8217;m cool with the original post, it just struck me negatively when after approving it I saw the exact same (promotional) comment elsewhere. With all due respect, if you want to plant seeds you probably should take the extra thirty seconds and switch up the text in future messages of that type nature. If you want to get personal feedback and participation you start by being personal, not mass mailish, that&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying. I asked for examples and was interested to see yours and then it made me feel like I got duped when I saw the same comment completely unpersonalized elsewhere.</p>
<p>Best of luck with your project <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putch</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326927</link>
		<author>Putch</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326927</guid>
		<description>TDavid - Thank you for the words of encouragement in your first comment. As to your second comment, yes, there have been on-topic comments made on a variety of blogs to plant the Putch seed in different communities so as to foster a broader range of feedback and participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDavid - Thank you for the words of encouragement in your first comment. As to your second comment, yes, there have been on-topic comments made on a variety of blogs to plant the Putch seed in different communities so as to foster a broader range of feedback and participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326891</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326891</guid>
		<description>Wait, putch, I just saw the exact same comment posted here &lt;a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/23/google-custom-search-tomorrow/#comment-294664"&gt;on Techcrunch&lt;/a&gt;. Are you crossposting the same comment to multiple blogs? That's very spammy behavior and definitely not appreciated or desired. Ironic considering the goals of your project ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, putch, I just saw the exact same comment posted here <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/10/23/google-custom-search-tomorrow/#comment-294664">on Techcrunch</a>. Are you crossposting the same comment to multiple blogs? That&#8217;s very spammy behavior and definitely not appreciated or desired. Ironic considering the goals of your project &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326888</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326888</guid>
		<description>Interesting group effort, Putch. As I wrote above, I'm definitely interested in the collaborative possibilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting group effort, Putch. As I wrote above, I&#8217;m definitely interested in the collaborative possibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Putch</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326884</link>
		<author>Putch</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20061024/3875/#comment-326884</guid>
		<description>Upon checking this out, three features stood out:
1) You can exclude sites that you do not want in the results
2) You can easily do so using the Google Marker
3) Anyone can volunteer to help

So we decided to throw up an experiment to encourage everyone to mark spam sites to be excluded from search results.

Working together as a community we may be able to radically improve the quality of the search results (or perhaps just get in a blacklisting war?)

The result is Putch - putch.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon checking this out, three features stood out:<br />
1) You can exclude sites that you do not want in the results<br />
2) You can easily do so using the Google Marker<br />
3) Anyone can volunteer to help</p>
<p>So we decided to throw up an experiment to encourage everyone to mark spam sites to be excluded from search results.</p>
<p>Working together as a community we may be able to radically improve the quality of the search results (or perhaps just get in a blacklisting war?)</p>
<p>The result is Putch - putch.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
