<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling their Blufr, yes, way</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Hmmcast #24: DRM, conversational blogging and time not on vloggling side</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-312343</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Hmmcast #24: DRM, conversational blogging and time not on vloggling side</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 01:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-312343</guid>
		<description>[...] Most Hmm-worthy posts from September 16 - September 22, 2006 - Calling their Blufr, yes, way (3) [sep 16] - Starting to see Live.com search referrals (1) [sep 18] - Eating on a floating restaurant (3) [sep 19] - Time still the biggest enemy of video blogging (0) [sep 20] - The search for more conversational blogging (2) [sep 20] - Mary Jo Foley leaves Microsoft Watch for ZDnet blog (5) [sep 20] &#8220;Mary Jo is independent, like most of the ZDNet bloggers. She truly has created her own operation, and we are lucky enough to have reached a deal for her to blog exclusively on ZDNet — but you’ll be seeing more of her in many places, I’m sure. At ZDNet we really embrace the idea of independent journalist/bloggers, and we seek out the best to partner with us. The model is not terribly unlike TV networks working with stars to make hit shows. James Gandolfini isn’t an employee of HBO, but he’s a big reason why I watch that network.&#8221; &#8211; Comment by Stephen Howard-Sarin — September 22, 2006 @ 7:17 am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Most Hmm-worthy posts from September 16 - September 22, 2006 - Calling their Blufr, yes, way (3) [sep 16] - Starting to see Live.com search referrals (1) [sep 18] - Eating on a floating restaurant (3) [sep 19] - Time still the biggest enemy of video blogging (0) [sep 20] - The search for more conversational blogging (2) [sep 20] - Mary Jo Foley leaves Microsoft Watch for ZDnet blog (5) [sep 20] &#8220;Mary Jo is independent, like most of the ZDNet bloggers. She truly has created her own operation, and we are lucky enough to have reached a deal for her to blog exclusively on ZDNet — but you’ll be seeing more of her in many places, I’m sure. At ZDNet we really embrace the idea of independent journalist/bloggers, and we seek out the best to partner with us. The model is not terribly unlike TV networks working with stars to make hit shows. James Gandolfini isn’t an employee of HBO, but he’s a big reason why I watch that network.&#8221; &#8211; Comment by Stephen Howard-Sarin — September 22, 2006 @ 7:17 am [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Newson</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306499</link>
		<author>Steve Newson</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 12:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306499</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if you had / have something similar in the US but in the UK I grew up with a TV program called "Call My Bluff". This was a team game in which the basic premise is one team provide three definitions of an obscure word taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, one definition is real, the other two are complete twaddle. The opposing team must guess which is the correct defintion. The teams take turns and in a half hour slot each team got about three turns. Much hilarity ensued and in a truly British way the result of the game was fairly meaningless, the entertainment was all about how people played the game. 

Dictionary, Balderdash, Blufr and Call My Bluff all seem like variations on the same theme.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you had / have something similar in the US but in the UK I grew up with a TV program called &#8220;Call My Bluff&#8221;. This was a team game in which the basic premise is one team provide three definitions of an obscure word taken from the Oxford English Dictionary, one definition is real, the other two are complete twaddle. The opposing team must guess which is the correct defintion. The teams take turns and in a half hour slot each team got about three turns. Much hilarity ensued and in a truly British way the result of the game was fairly meaningless, the entertainment was all about how people played the game. </p>
<p>Dictionary, Balderdash, Blufr and Call My Bluff all seem like variations on the same theme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306468</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306468</guid>
		<description>Actually, I got kind of bored with the game itself after a few minutes (in other words I sucked at it, lol), but I like the viral marketing aspect. We're seeing more sites that allow you to take their content and use it on your sites (YouTube and Blaugh come immediately to mind) and it's paying dividends. Good for them, good for you (if their sites can handle the bandwidth). 

I'd like to see a dictionary site do something like &lt;a href="http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/163"&gt;Balderdash&lt;/a&gt;. Ever played that one, Steve? Probably would make a fun online game if enough people could play. I didn't look, but somebody has probabaly already done that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I got kind of bored with the game itself after a few minutes (in other words I sucked at it, lol), but I like the viral marketing aspect. We&#8217;re seeing more sites that allow you to take their content and use it on your sites (YouTube and Blaugh come immediately to mind) and it&#8217;s paying dividends. Good for them, good for you (if their sites can handle the bandwidth). </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a dictionary site do something like <a href="http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/163">Balderdash</a>. Ever played that one, Steve? Probably would make a fun online game if enough people could play. I didn&#8217;t look, but somebody has probabaly already done that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Newson</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306466</link>
		<author>Steve Newson</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060916/3791/#comment-306466</guid>
		<description>It's quite addictive isn't it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite addictive isn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
