A planet full of Bicentennial men and women |
Sure, I’d like to live longer, another 100 or 200 years would be great, but if everybody lived to 1,000 or longer, what would the world population be like? We’d need to move to another planet or space to accomodate the massive amount of people on this planet.
As humans already are living longer it is impacting the total number of people in the world. Considering most of the world is covered with oceans, I’m seeing sardine cans in the future. And that’s not even getting into the environmental concerns of a world with humans living to 1,000 or more.
When we get these therapies, we will no longer all get frail and decrepit and dependent as we get older, and eventually succumb to the innumerable ghastly progressive diseases of old age.
Living a century is a good life. It’s sad when people have their life cut short and while these futuristic age treatments — which the article suggests might be available in my lifetime — will do nothing to counter accidents and murder, I think living a century is a good, fair amount of time. Cheating the death clock has so many layers of complexities to unravel, discuss and debate. Would I take a treatment to live longer? Sure, I would. Who wouldn’t?
That’s the problem. The movie Bicentennial Man probed with a robot played by Robin Williams that artificially prolonged the life of the woman he loved. I wouldn’t want to see my children and grandchildren and others die before me. That’s not the way it’s supposed to work, is it?
One depressing reality about life is when you finally amass the money to retire and relax and enjoy life you typically have the fewest number of years to enjoy these fruits of labor. But I’m not sure having some elixir of prolonged youth is the best answer.
Part of what makes us human is that we die in a somewhat predictable order. Parents die before children. Children die before grandchildren. Sometimes the order is upset and death is tragically early, sometimes we live longer than we should, but a centuy is a good length of time, isn’t it? If we can’t accomplish everything we want to do in this life in 75-100 years (or possibly more), how much more time do we need?
Related Posts- Valentines: 80 years of marriage
- How long before somebody lives to 120?
- Nihilism - Our New Ethos?
- Analyzing the Death Star’s planet destructive power
- Climate changes could cause global catastrophe by 2020, say climatologists
- Does 17 years qualify for giving marital advice?





There have been lots of changes to human life that have impacted it enormously (not the least of which is the computer), and we always figure out ways to cope. If we started living a lot longer, we would colonize space, or start having fewer children, or get used to living on top of each other, or some combination.
And we’d probably work longer, too. Because we can, and society adjusts to the resources it has available. Economics would not allow the work force of age 20-65 to support the population of age 65-1000. So you only get a long retirement if you live long compared to everyone else. And no matter how much money you have, it’s never too much.
Comment by Sterling Camden — June 26, 2006 @ 3:35 pm PST