<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Netscape.com righteous or ripoff of Digg debate begins</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Netscape digg clone to be moved, how long before more AOL/WIN casualties are realized? &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-633046</link>
		<author>Netscape digg clone to be moved, how long before more AOL/WIN casualties are realized? &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-633046</guid>
		<description>[...] morning I read that the Netscape digg clone idea that Jason Calacanis and crew masterminded is being moved &#8230; somewhere: Visitors to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] morning I read that the Netscape digg clone idea that Jason Calacanis and crew masterminded is being moved &#8230; somewhere: Visitors to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Calacanis wants to siphon the most active blood from Digg and call them Netscape Navigators</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-233483</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Calacanis wants to siphon the most active blood from Digg and call them Netscape Navigators</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-233483</guid>
		<description>[...] Calacanis is no fool. This is a disruptive play. And this what Netscape needs if it is to ever be a significant player with its new digg-type format. I said it before, they have the traffic. And they have the dollars to throw around. As long as they have those two things, this is a long way from over. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Calacanis is no fool. This is a disruptive play. And this what Netscape needs if it is to ever be a significant player with its new digg-type format. I said it before, they have the traffic. And they have the dollars to throw around. As long as they have those two things, this is a long way from over. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; One week of paint on new Netscape beta, Digg still the big story</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-188528</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; One week of paint on new Netscape beta, Digg still the big story</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-188528</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of Digg, they have v3.0 launching &#8220;early&#8221; Monday morning and had a launch party in San Francisco [pictures here]. The next incarnation of Digg will open up to a more diverse number of categories leaving the tech geek niche. And what about Digg-like Netscape beta which launched a week ago? Guess what the top story is as of this writing? The pending Digg v3.0 launch. I&#8217;m not sure at what point this joke becomes real old, or if it&#8217;s already there, but it seems strange visiting the new Netscape and seeing stories about the new Digg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Speaking of Digg, they have v3.0 launching &#8220;early&#8221; Monday morning and had a launch party in San Francisco [pictures here]. The next incarnation of Digg will open up to a more diverse number of categories leaving the tech geek niche. And what about Digg-like Netscape beta which launched a week ago? Guess what the top story is as of this writing? The pending Digg v3.0 launch. I&#8217;m not sure at what point this joke becomes real old, or if it&#8217;s already there, but it seems strange visiting the new Netscape and seeing stories about the new Digg. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Barr&#8217;s Blog &#187; Taking Great Screen Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-185215</link>
		<author>Jeff Barr&#8217;s Blog &#187; Taking Great Screen Shots</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-185215</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this week, my friend TDavid had a really tall screen shot in his story about Netscape&#8217;s Digg clone. Taking a screen shot this tall using my method would take me at least 20 minutes, so I figured there had to be a better way. I posted a comment on his blog, and he told pointed me at Andy Mutton&#8217;s Screen Grab utility for Firefox. Installed it and restarted, and it seemed to work pretty well. I started getting some weird errors (perhaps because I have a really wide screen and was snapshotting some very tall pages). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Earlier this week, my friend TDavid had a really tall screen shot in his story about Netscape&#8217;s Digg clone. Taking a screen shot this tall using my method would take me at least 20 minutes, so I figured there had to be a better way. I posted a comment on his blog, and he told pointed me at Andy Mutton&#8217;s Screen Grab utility for Firefox. Installed it and restarted, and it seemed to work pretty well. I started getting some weird errors (perhaps because I have a really wide screen and was snapshotting some very tall pages). [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-185019</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-185019</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1146/"&gt;Firefox extension&lt;/a&gt; Jeff via &lt;a href="http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060612/3431/"&gt;Hmm Quickies #28&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1146/">Firefox extension</a> Jeff via <a href="http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060612/3431/">Hmm Quickies #28</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Barr</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184813</link>
		<author>Jeff Barr</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184813</guid>
		<description>How did you take that amazingly tall screen shot? Do you have some an equally tall monitor, did you cut and paste, or is there some kind of magic way to do this that no one told me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you take that amazingly tall screen shot? Do you have some an equally tall monitor, did you cut and paste, or is there some kind of magic way to do this that no one told me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184062</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184062</guid>
		<description>I'm not a big fan of frames, Sid, although they have they do have their place in some cases. Some of our sites have break out of code built into them (not this one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of frames, Sid, although they have they do have their place in some cases. Some of our sites have break out of code built into them (not this one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sid Steward</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184011</link>
		<author>Sid Steward</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-184011</guid>
		<description>What do you think of how AOL frames external sites?  I found their frameset useful, but my own experiments with framing other sites discouraged me from ever trying it.  It wasn't just that they might break out of the frame (understandable) but that their JavaScripts could break and make a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of how AOL frames external sites?  I found their frameset useful, but my own experiments with framing other sites discouraged me from ever trying it.  It wasn&#8217;t just that they might break out of the frame (understandable) but that their JavaScripts could break and make a mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-183915</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-183915</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is kind of hot, Jason. Thanks for sharing that. I updated the post with that info. I'm currently checking it out and submitting a few stories. Will be very interesting to see where this leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is kind of hot, Jason. Thanks for sharing that. I updated the post with that info. I&#8217;m currently checking it out and submitting a few stories. Will be very interesting to see where this leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-183840</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060615/3445/#comment-183840</guid>
		<description>we are in beta... yes. we will get there, a ton of folks are trying to get in and the activity is just crazy.

we are not going to kill DIGG or Newsvine. We're doing something new... we're adding a group of full-time anchors to the popurls/delicious/furl/digg/reddit model. When a story hits the top 20 we will do reporting on it... so, imagine the site as the New York Times but the users select what the reporters work on.

that's kind of hot i think....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>we are in beta&#8230; yes. we will get there, a ton of folks are trying to get in and the activity is just crazy.</p>
<p>we are not going to kill DIGG or Newsvine. We&#8217;re doing something new&#8230; we&#8217;re adding a group of full-time anchors to the popurls/delicious/furl/digg/reddit model. When a story hits the top 20 we will do reporting on it&#8230; so, imagine the site as the New York Times but the users select what the reporters work on.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s kind of hot i think&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
