<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Del.icio.us most popular spam problem</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060605/3403/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Social media sites overdose, del.icio.us should innovate, not imitate</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060605/3403/#comment-317296</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Social media sites overdose, del.icio.us should innovate, not imitate</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060605/3403/#comment-317296</guid>
		<description>[...] If this becomes the case, beam me out, Scotty. I&#8217;ve already seen del.icio.us hit with spam in the past and fortunately it was scrubbed out by them fairly quickly. Sometimes I see del.icio.us popular items that look very artificial to me, similar to front page digg items that seem more about the collection of a group of digg buddies than true collective voting, but who knows. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If this becomes the case, beam me out, Scotty. I&#8217;ve already seen del.icio.us hit with spam in the past and fortunately it was scrubbed out by them fairly quickly. Sometimes I see del.icio.us popular items that look very artificial to me, similar to front page digg items that seem more about the collection of a group of digg buddies than true collective voting, but who knows. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
