<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Vistance, another Vista delay?</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060502/3253/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Forser</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060502/3253/#comment-73088</link>
		<author>Forser</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 06:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060502/3253/#comment-73088</guid>
		<description>IF you can run Windows XP today on a machine, you will be able to run Vista also.
Maybe not with all the "big" bang and stuff but it is already pretty fast for a early beta with everything turned on and i have a older machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF you can run Windows XP today on a machine, you will be able to run Vista also.<br />
Maybe not with all the &#8220;big&#8221; bang and stuff but it is already pretty fast for a early beta with everything turned on and i have a older machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060502/3253/#comment-72954</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060502/3253/#comment-72954</guid>
		<description>If true, no doubt it will spell trouble of some sort for Microsoft.  I agree with you, though, that putting a buggy version out for release would be far worse than taking a delay, whatever the impact to their finances and reputation for timeliness (they have plenty of the former -- do they still have any of the latter anyway?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If true, no doubt it will spell trouble of some sort for Microsoft.  I agree with you, though, that putting a buggy version out for release would be far worse than taking a delay, whatever the impact to their finances and reputation for timeliness (they have plenty of the former &#8212; do they still have any of the latter anyway?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
