<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tech sites come together for creative Beatles headlines</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060415/3161/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Judge rules against Beatles parent company over Apple lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060415/3161/#comment-74526</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Judge rules against Beatles parent company over Apple lawsuit</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060415/3161/#comment-74526</guid>
		<description>[...] Insert your favorite Beatles song headline to describe the decision made in the case of Apple computer vs. Apple Corps the parent company of the Beatles music library owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Yoko Ono and the estate of George Harrison. USA Today, the BBC and others have the details.  Judge Edward Mann ruled that Apple Computer used the fruit logo in association with the store, not the music, and thus did not breach the agreement. &#8220;I conclude that the use of the apple logo &#8230; does not suggest a relevant connection with the creative work,&#8221; Mann said in his written judgment. &#8220;I think that the use of the apple logo is a fair and reasonable use of the mark in connection with the service, which does not go further and unfairly or unreasonably suggest an additional association with the creative works themselves.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Insert your favorite Beatles song headline to describe the decision made in the case of Apple computer vs. Apple Corps the parent company of the Beatles music library owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Yoko Ono and the estate of George Harrison. USA Today, the BBC and others have the details.  Judge Edward Mann ruled that Apple Computer used the fruit logo in association with the store, not the music, and thus did not breach the agreement. &#8220;I conclude that the use of the apple logo &#8230; does not suggest a relevant connection with the creative work,&#8221; Mann said in his written judgment. &#8220;I think that the use of the apple logo is a fair and reasonable use of the mark in connection with the service, which does not go further and unfairly or unreasonably suggest an additional association with the creative works themselves.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060415/3161/#comment-68272</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060415/3161/#comment-68272</guid>
		<description>She Came in Through the Download Window
Do Let Me Down
Golden Numbers Fill Your Drives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She Came in Through the Download Window<br />
Do Let Me Down<br />
Golden Numbers Fill Your Drives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
