<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Live chat on a blog not really for me, is it for you?</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Hmmcast #1: spiders, faces, groups, ++jury_duty, &#8211;hearing</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-64212</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Hmmcast #1: spiders, faces, groups, ++jury_duty, &#8211;hearing</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-64212</guid>
		<description>[...] Most hmm-worthy posts from March 23 - March 31, 2006 - Live chat on a blog not really for me, is it for you? (6) [mar 23] - Slingbox Mobile available for download, hurry before they start charging (1) [mar 24] - Spider Shoulder Voyeur (4) [mar 26] - Facebook jumps the $750 million shark (0) [mar 28] - Loren&#8217;s Perry Mason moment (4) [mar 28] - Blending FeedBlendr and Alertbear shows common weakness (4) [mar 29] - *Yahoo Groups weakness obvious and embarassing (1) [mar 29] - Huh? What? I can&#8217;t hear you, Apple (2) [mar 30] - Amazon CTO&#8217;s naked conversation over blogging value (0) [mar 31] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Most hmm-worthy posts from March 23 - March 31, 2006 - Live chat on a blog not really for me, is it for you? (6) [mar 23] - Slingbox Mobile available for download, hurry before they start charging (1) [mar 24] - Spider Shoulder Voyeur (4) [mar 26] - Facebook jumps the $750 million shark (0) [mar 28] - Loren&#8217;s Perry Mason moment (4) [mar 28] - Blending FeedBlendr and Alertbear shows common weakness (4) [mar 29] - *Yahoo Groups weakness obvious and embarassing (1) [mar 29] - Huh? What? I can&#8217;t hear you, Apple (2) [mar 30] - Amazon CTO&#8217;s naked conversation over blogging value (0) [mar 31] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamal</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61729</link>
		<author>kamal</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61729</guid>
		<description>What I liked about it is that I can talk with other people viewing the blog.  Comments are cool and important to a blog.  This should be an add-on, not an alternative to comments.  I like the combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I liked about it is that I can talk with other people viewing the blog.  Comments are cool and important to a blog.  This should be an add-on, not an alternative to comments.  I like the combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61619</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61619</guid>
		<description>It's cute, but as you said not very useful.  I've used IM for customer support before, and you always end up copying and pasting the conversation into an e-mail to save it.  Worse, you forget to do that and then log off.  Plus, you kinda have to both be there to carry on the conversation, whereas with e-mail you can converse with the other party absent and they can reply whenever.  And I agree about persistence and link-love: both good things that chat just doesn't do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s cute, but as you said not very useful.  I&#8217;ve used IM for customer support before, and you always end up copying and pasting the conversation into an e-mail to save it.  Worse, you forget to do that and then log off.  Plus, you kinda have to both be there to carry on the conversation, whereas with e-mail you can converse with the other party absent and they can reply whenever.  And I agree about persistence and link-love: both good things that chat just doesn&#8217;t do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61590</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61590</guid>
		<description>Interesting comment, Fuzz. Thanks. I'm not sure I care for mobber and its ilk as an "alternative to comments" because comments add value to this blog and to the person leaving them (since we don't use rel=nofollow). The comments in a chat are more like using an IM client to me. That's not saying having a chatroom or IM connected to a blog is a bad thing, heck, we have an IRC channel for one of our sites (not a blog) but the people who come along after the fact and ask questions that have already been answered in chat won't benefit from this the same way as those who leave comments like you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comment, Fuzz. Thanks. I&#8217;m not sure I care for mobber and its ilk as an &#8220;alternative to comments&#8221; because comments add value to this blog and to the person leaving them (since we don&#8217;t use rel=nofollow). The comments in a chat are more like using an IM client to me. That&#8217;s not saying having a chatroom or IM connected to a blog is a bad thing, heck, we have an IRC channel for one of our sites (not a blog) but the people who come along after the fact and ask questions that have already been answered in chat won&#8217;t benefit from this the same way as those who leave comments like you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzz</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61589</link>
		<author>Fuzz</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61589</guid>
		<description>This is cool but it's an alternative to comments. Personally I love comments because you can go back at any time and see what people said. I assume with this chat thing there isn't any persistence. Guess sometimes that's a good thing.

Fuzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool but it&#8217;s an alternative to comments. Personally I love comments because you can go back at any time and see what people said. I assume with this chat thing there isn&#8217;t any persistence. Guess sometimes that&#8217;s a good thing.</p>
<p>Fuzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61345</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61345</guid>
		<description>Yup, David, that's the deal. Thanks for stopping by :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, David, that&#8217;s the deal. Thanks for stopping by <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61343</link>
		<author>David</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060323/2941/#comment-61343</guid>
		<description>Looks cool to me - even if you're not around, I can chat with other readers no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks cool to me - even if you&#8217;re not around, I can chat with other readers no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
