<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop the premature eGooglation</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060218/2962/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Why can&#8217;t Google experiment?</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060218/2962/#comment-151195</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Why can&#8217;t Google experiment?</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060218/2962/#comment-151195</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve already written about the unequal and often undeserved amount of Google attention being attributed to rough and often uninspired product launches: stop the premature eGooglation, but it sure seems like the greater tech media (including blogs) has made every Google launch &#8216;official&#8217; even when they clearly designate as &#8220;limited&#8221; such as with their new Spreadsheets. Isn&#8217;t a lab supposed to experiment and innovate? If they don&#8217;t do anything new then people will criticize them (rightly) for sitting on the money. Getting lazy. Just as Microsoft has been criticized in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve already written about the unequal and often undeserved amount of Google attention being attributed to rough and often uninspired product launches: stop the premature eGooglation, but it sure seems like the greater tech media (including blogs) has made every Google launch &#8216;official&#8217; even when they clearly designate as &#8220;limited&#8221; such as with their new Spreadsheets. Isn&#8217;t a lab supposed to experiment and innovate? If they don&#8217;t do anything new then people will criticize them (rightly) for sitting on the money. Getting lazy. Just as Microsoft has been criticized in the past. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Microsoft Office is *TOO* expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060218/2962/#comment-150715</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Microsoft Office is *TOO* expensive</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060218/2962/#comment-150715</guid>
		<description>[...] Unlike too many others, I&#8217;m not going to comment on that service until I actually use and measure if it&#8217;s worthwhile for our businesses and my life. Doubtful that it will be, but I&#8217;m still keeping an open mind. I signed up for a beta invite but haven&#8217;t been deemed worthy yet. Generally speaking, I agree with Jeremy on the Google overhype stuff. They are overhyped (Disclaimer: I own GOOG stock), which I covered in stop the premature eGooglation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Unlike too many others, I&#8217;m not going to comment on that service until I actually use and measure if it&#8217;s worthwhile for our businesses and my life. Doubtful that it will be, but I&#8217;m still keeping an open mind. I signed up for a beta invite but haven&#8217;t been deemed worthy yet. Generally speaking, I agree with Jeremy on the Google overhype stuff. They are overhyped (Disclaimer: I own GOOG stock), which I covered in stop the premature eGooglation. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
