<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are we over-infatuated with Google?</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Begging vs. earning links vs. white male tech gatekeeper snobs</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53498</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Begging vs. earning links vs. white male tech gatekeeper snobs</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53498</guid>
		<description>[...] I link to stuff that makes me go hmm and it doesn&#8217;t matter if your site, product, software, service, blog, whatever is brand new or it is the hottest new thing from GYM. In fact, I sometimes intentionally do not link to Google, Yahoo and Microsoft because I&#8217;m sick of reading about them too. I also do not factor in whether to link to stuff based upon the author&#8217;s race, sex or sexual orientation, age, etc. In fact, sometimes the nicknames that people use confuse me as to if they are male or female anyway, so how would I know? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I link to stuff that makes me go hmm and it doesn&#8217;t matter if your site, product, software, service, blog, whatever is brand new or it is the hottest new thing from GYM. In fact, I sometimes intentionally do not link to Google, Yahoo and Microsoft because I&#8217;m sick of reading about them too. I also do not factor in whether to link to stuff based upon the author&#8217;s race, sex or sexual orientation, age, etc. In fact, sometimes the nicknames that people use confuse me as to if they are male or female anyway, so how would I know? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53107</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53107</guid>
		<description>A cocomment casualty, eh Nathan? I agree with you about not covering them *at all*, which isn't what the entry above is about, it's about covering them *too much*. It doesn't apply to Google-focused blogs like yours which I was careful to exclude. 

I think some of the coverage Google is getting is hysterical, undeserved and leaves time for other things happening in the tech world unnoticed and sparsely covered by the people who can get additional traction. Bloggers that show up in places like memeorandum are in a special situation where they can get a spotlight on different stories than Google. Where are the up and coming next wizards in their garages or leaky basements? As mentioned above a blog that focuses on all things Google, like yours, is different from this one in the sense that some readers aren't expecting to read Google this and Google that every day. I guess yesterday when I wrote this I was feeling a bit Google constipated. I'm still rolling around an idea of a game and making this something fun instead of something negative.

None of this means of course that I won't be writing about Google today, tomorrow and the next day or maybe three times in a row. Just thinking aloud. That's what I do here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cocomment casualty, eh Nathan? I agree with you about not covering them *at all*, which isn&#8217;t what the entry above is about, it&#8217;s about covering them *too much*. It doesn&#8217;t apply to Google-focused blogs like yours which I was careful to exclude. </p>
<p>I think some of the coverage Google is getting is hysterical, undeserved and leaves time for other things happening in the tech world unnoticed and sparsely covered by the people who can get additional traction. Bloggers that show up in places like memeorandum are in a special situation where they can get a spotlight on different stories than Google. Where are the up and coming next wizards in their garages or leaky basements? As mentioned above a blog that focuses on all things Google, like yours, is different from this one in the sense that some readers aren&#8217;t expecting to read Google this and Google that every day. I guess yesterday when I wrote this I was feeling a bit Google constipated. I&#8217;m still rolling around an idea of a game and making this something fun instead of something negative.</p>
<p>None of this means of course that I won&#8217;t be writing about Google today, tomorrow and the next day or maybe three times in a row. Just thinking aloud. That&#8217;s what I do here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53064</link>
		<author>Nathan Weinberg</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53064</guid>
		<description>Crap!  CoComment lost my comment!

Well, from what I remember, I said, "Hey buddy" and then made some great points about how:

a) if you ignore Google you might as well ignore current events; they're big news, and you'd need to be an ostrich to have your head so far in the sand as to not see them and have something to say

b) Google is more in the news for bad reasons, most involving the government, and when it does get good press, it is over small products or features that are sometimes targeted at early adopters

c) if Google keep getting bad press, they'll eventually try to deperately get their image back up, and that's what'll kill them.  That need to meet expectations is what killed Netscape development, where they were too afraid to release, and by the time they did, they had lost.  Google could fall in a similar trap, stopping to release betas or anything until its polished and jaw-dropping, and thus product development cycles will take so long and get so bogged down in committee, and Microsoft will be sitting pretty, writing code and shipping product that people use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap!  CoComment lost my comment!</p>
<p>Well, from what I remember, I said, &#8220;Hey buddy&#8221; and then made some great points about how:</p>
<p>a) if you ignore Google you might as well ignore current events; they&#8217;re big news, and you&#8217;d need to be an ostrich to have your head so far in the sand as to not see them and have something to say</p>
<p>b) Google is more in the news for bad reasons, most involving the government, and when it does get good press, it is over small products or features that are sometimes targeted at early adopters</p>
<p>c) if Google keep getting bad press, they&#8217;ll eventually try to deperately get their image back up, and that&#8217;s what&#8217;ll kill them.  That need to meet expectations is what killed Netscape development, where they were too afraid to release, and by the time they did, they had lost.  Google could fall in a similar trap, stopping to release betas or anything until its polished and jaw-dropping, and thus product development cycles will take so long and get so bogged down in committee, and Microsoft will be sitting pretty, writing code and shipping product that people use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53035</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53035</guid>
		<description>Oh no, Paul, please don't bite your lip! Where are you getting troll from? LOL. Keep speaking up, I like the questions you are asking. You're making me go hmm :) Trust me, if I'm upset with somebody, yourself included, it will be very easy to spot. Keep reading and thank you for the support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, Paul, please don&#8217;t bite your lip! Where are you getting troll from? LOL. Keep speaking up, I like the questions you are asking. You&#8217;re making me go hmm <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Trust me, if I&#8217;m upset with somebody, yourself included, it will be very easy to spot. Keep reading and thank you for the support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53033</link>
		<author>Paul Benjamin</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53033</guid>
		<description>I hope that I am not too annoying.  I am not a troll, at least in my mind.

I first listened to you on webtalk and have been reading you for about a year off and on.

I like your site and I think I will byte my lip for a while.  I would hate to ware out my welcome.

The Google news cycle will work itself out.  I just think for such a large group of smart people they have been doing some stupid things lately. Maybe if the stock cools off and everybody sees that they can do bad products too the news will get back to the proportion of the market they actually have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that I am not too annoying.  I am not a troll, at least in my mind.</p>
<p>I first listened to you on webtalk and have been reading you for about a year off and on.</p>
<p>I like your site and I think I will byte my lip for a while.  I would hate to ware out my welcome.</p>
<p>The Google news cycle will work itself out.  I just think for such a large group of smart people they have been doing some stupid things lately. Maybe if the stock cools off and everybody sees that they can do bad products too the news will get back to the proportion of the market they actually have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53001</link>
		<author>matthew</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060208/2929/#comment-53001</guid>
		<description>Google got lots of coverage on Megite too (http://www.megite.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google got lots of coverage on Megite too (http://www.megite.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
