<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beattie goes nursery school, not &#8220;old school&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Read the Comment Rules about Names</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-796623</link>
		<author>Read the Comment Rules about Names</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-796623</guid>
		<description>C'mon it really isn't that bad. The web is a dynamic super group of entities that always changes. Old content that doesn't change soon gets flushed. If you are worried about your links that don't point to comments that were made previously then you will have to change your text so that you get the links right. Its just a normal part of being a net citizen that we all are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon it really isn&#8217;t that bad. The web is a dynamic super group of entities that always changes. Old content that doesn&#8217;t change soon gets flushed. If you are worried about your links that don&#8217;t point to comments that were made previously then you will have to change your text so that you get the links right. Its just a normal part of being a net citizen that we all are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; From no comments to no blog</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-70722</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; From no comments to no blog</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-70722</guid>
		<description>[...] Absolutely no surprise or doubt from me on either count. The next time somebody closes their comments and nukes all the past comments, it might be a darn good signal they are out of gas both figuratively and literally. Certainly enough for this reader to eject. A mere couple months ahead of the other former readers Mr. Beattie is now encouraging to unsubscribe. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Absolutely no surprise or doubt from me on either count. The next time somebody closes their comments and nukes all the past comments, it might be a darn good signal they are out of gas both figuratively and literally. Certainly enough for this reader to eject. A mere couple months ahead of the other former readers Mr. Beattie is now encouraging to unsubscribe. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54330</link>
		<author>Sterling Camden</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54330</guid>
		<description>Fitting that this post keeps getting more and more comments...oops, there goes another one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitting that this post keeps getting more and more comments&#8230;oops, there goes another one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lana</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54328</link>
		<author>Lana</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54328</guid>
		<description>Beattie deleted the feedback to his own  blog.  People rewrite history all the time.  How well they succeed depends on how well the people
living thru  events remember the facts.  Interpretation  adds a lot, good and bad, but it can only go  so far.  By  wanting to discard  comments
he created a new topic, which drew me in.  Now, does his rejection count as rejection of the reputations of the people who contributed to
his blog, or did he reject part of himself?  It definitely did not destroy anyone's identity.  But  did he clean his house too well?  
Some think he might have second thoughts, some think he will  come out unscathed.  Is it necessary to keep repeating his name?
Remember, that the novel  Roots  had the seed of oral history to help it blossom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beattie deleted the feedback to his own  blog.  People rewrite history all the time.  How well they succeed depends on how well the people<br />
living thru  events remember the facts.  Interpretation  adds a lot, good and bad, but it can only go  so far.  By  wanting to discard  comments<br />
he created a new topic, which drew me in.  Now, does his rejection count as rejection of the reputations of the people who contributed to<br />
his blog, or did he reject part of himself?  It definitely did not destroy anyone&#8217;s identity.  But  did he clean his house too well?<br />
Some think he might have second thoughts, some think he will  come out unscathed.  Is it necessary to keep repeating his name?<br />
Remember, that the novel  Roots  had the seed of oral history to help it blossom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54195</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-54195</guid>
		<description>Nathan, I just noticed in cocomment that you left this comment here on 2/8:

&gt; Nathan_Weinberg as Nathan Weinberg:
&gt; T, did you see that Russel called you a "wack job"?

Not sure why that comment never made it here, but just wanted to let you know that I saw it and posted it here. I wonder why it never showed up?  You seen that happen with any other comments you've left elsewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, I just noticed in cocomment that you left this comment here on 2/8:</p>
<p>> Nathan_Weinberg as Nathan Weinberg:<br />
> T, did you see that Russel called you a &#8220;wack job&#8221;?</p>
<p>Not sure why that comment never made it here, but just wanted to let you know that I saw it and posted it here. I wonder why it never showed up?  You seen that happen with any other comments you&#8217;ve left elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lana</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53952</link>
		<author>Lana</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53952</guid>
		<description>I  understand the right of the blogger to remove comments.  However, what does it mean when you reply to a blog on USA Today ON Deadline
(about Google and the government wanting to collect  our search records indiscriminately hoping to catch some who contact pornography
sites.) and the complete article disappears from the site?    Almost immediately.poof!  The  article was gone  from the page.  Where did it go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  understand the right of the blogger to remove comments.  However, what does it mean when you reply to a blog on USA Today ON Deadline<br />
(about Google and the government wanting to collect  our search records indiscriminately hoping to catch some who contact pornography<br />
sites.) and the complete article disappears from the site?    Almost immediately.poof!  The  article was gone  from the page.  Where did it go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Begging vs. earning links vs. white male tech gatekeeper snobs</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53497</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Begging vs. earning links vs. white male tech gatekeeper snobs</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53497</guid>
		<description>[...] Let me add &#8216;wack job&#8217; to Shelley&#8217;s list, which is the label one popular blogger chose recently for me (now proudly a former reader) because he didn&#8217;t like my flames over nuking all his past comments, but to his credit at least he linked me in as part of the conversation. Nevermind that I was the only person (that I saw anyway, I&#8217;m sure somebody else somewhere offered help) who ultimately gave the guy a two minute one line code technical solution to the whole mess &#8212; which he has still ignored to date. Just because people disagree agree with you doesn&#8217;t mean they are any of the labels Shelley or I mentioned. In fact, I think when someone tries to sink in a debate to namecalling or stereotyping, it weakens their position severely. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Let me add &#8216;wack job&#8217; to Shelley&#8217;s list, which is the label one popular blogger chose recently for me (now proudly a former reader) because he didn&#8217;t like my flames over nuking all his past comments, but to his credit at least he linked me in as part of the conversation. Nevermind that I was the only person (that I saw anyway, I&#8217;m sure somebody else somewhere offered help) who ultimately gave the guy a two minute one line code technical solution to the whole mess &#8212; which he has still ignored to date. Just because people disagree agree with you doesn&#8217;t mean they are any of the labels Shelley or I mentioned. In fact, I think when someone tries to sink in a debate to namecalling or stereotyping, it weakens their position severely. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53157</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53157</guid>
		<description>Nice picture (worth a thousand words indeed). ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice picture (worth a thousand words indeed). <img src='http://www.makeyougohmm.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonymousCoward</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53143</link>
		<author>AnonymousCoward</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53143</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from a guy that works for a company is responsible for putting Chinese dissidents in jail.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060209-6150.html

Shame on you Russell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from a guy that works for a company is responsible for putting Chinese dissidents in jail.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060209-6150.html">http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060209-6150.html</a></p>
<p>Shame on you Russell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53010</link>
		<author>Scott Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060206/2921/#comment-53010</guid>
		<description>Breaking links is certainly bad for the mojo.  And while I enjoyed the picture above, I think the message that it presents is a bit harsh.  If Mr. Beattie wants his site to suck, let it be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Breaking links is certainly bad for the mojo.  And while I enjoyed the picture above, I think the message that it presents is a bit harsh.  If Mr. Beattie wants his site to suck, let it be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
