<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN responded and complied with DOJ request &#8230; last summer!</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Book.com</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51606</link>
		<author>SEO Book.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51606</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Privacy, User Data, Trust and Marketing&lt;/strong&gt;

Post about the recent government lawsuit against Google aiming to pry away search query data from Google. AOL, MSN and Yahoo! lamely gave up similar search data without informing their users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Privacy, User Data, Trust and Marketing</strong></p>
<p>Post about the recent government lawsuit against Google aiming to pry away search query data from Google. AOL, MSN and Yahoo! lamely gave up similar search data without informing their users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51473</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51473</guid>
		<description>rich - it wouldn't have been idiotic if the information was benign and also last summer was a time when people were having fits about Google and privacy. The timing was ripe. Go back through the news cycles in the summer of 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rich - it wouldn&#8217;t have been idiotic if the information was benign and also last summer was a time when people were having fits about Google and privacy. The timing was ripe. Go back through the news cycles in the summer of 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51471</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51471</guid>
		<description>orangecrush - maybe so. Still a missed opportunity.

Seth - maybe you missed the part about it being an opportunity to be upfront about the situation? If the information was so benign as Mr. Moss contends, there was little risk in a "firestorm."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>orangecrush - maybe so. Still a missed opportunity.</p>
<p>Seth - maybe you missed the part about it being an opportunity to be upfront about the situation? If the information was so benign as Mr. Moss contends, there was little risk in a &#8220;firestorm.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uli's objets trouvés.</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51365</link>
		<author>uli's objets trouvés.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51365</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Search Engines And Trust.&lt;/strong&gt;


Back then there was a chance to come out at a time when Google was being pounded over privacy concerns and stand up to the government instead of folding like a cheap lawn chair and working out some technical response that we would only learn about mon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Search Engines And Trust.</strong></p>
<p>Back then there was a chance to come out at a time when Google was being pounded over privacy concerns and stand up to the government instead of folding like a cheap lawn chair and working out some technical response that we would only learn about mon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51350</link>
		<author>rich</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51350</guid>
		<description>When do you think Google was subpoenaed?  Just wondering if they "came clean" the second they were.  If MSN did "come clean" people would just stop using their engine to play it safe.  It would be idiotic for them to say anything back then.  When you think about it, Google is the one playing it safe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When do you think Google was subpoenaed?  Just wondering if they &#8220;came clean&#8221; the second they were.  If MSN did &#8220;come clean&#8221; people would just stop using their engine to play it safe.  It would be idiotic for them to say anything back then.  When you think about it, Google is the one playing it safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51344</link>
		<author>Seth Finkelstein</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51344</guid>
		<description>Umm, perhaps they didn't makea fuss because the data wasn't connected to any individual, and they didn't want to spark off a firestorm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, perhaps they didn&#8217;t makea fuss because the data wasn&#8217;t connected to any individual, and they didn&#8217;t want to spark off a firestorm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#62;&#62; How about a search engine that doesn&#8217;t log? @ Alex Moskalyuk Online</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51340</link>
		<author>&#62;&#62; How about a search engine that doesn&#8217;t log? @ Alex Moskalyuk Online</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51340</guid>
		<description>[...] The recent uproar regarding administration subpoena sent to search engines brings up a pretty good business model for someone who&#8217;s trying to make it in the search field, like Dogpile or Icerocket - don&#8217;t collect any user data. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The recent uproar regarding administration subpoena sent to search engines brings up a pretty good business model for someone who&#8217;s trying to make it in the search field, like Dogpile or Icerocket - don&#8217;t collect any user data. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; MSN Search On DOJ Demands&#160;&#160;InsideMicrosoft - part of the Blog News Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51336</link>
		<author>&#187; MSN Search On DOJ Demands&#160;&#160;InsideMicrosoft - part of the Blog News Channel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51336</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: HMM.. says in response to MSN&#8217;s blog post: Rest assured that high on my list of things to take to Search Champs v4 next week will be much more transparency about privacy issues and clearer privacy policies for MSN Search. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] UPDATE: HMM.. says in response to MSN&#8217;s blog post: Rest assured that high on my list of things to take to Search Champs v4 next week will be much more transparency about privacy issues and clearer privacy policies for MSN Search. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangecrush</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51288</link>
		<author>orangecrush</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060121/2866/#comment-51288</guid>
		<description>I just wonder if Microsoft was so tired of the government attacks in previous years, that they were a bit brow beaten and just gave them what they wanted to keep, the DOJ off their back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wonder if Microsoft was so tired of the government attacks in previous years, that they were a bit brow beaten and just gave them what they wanted to keep, the DOJ off their back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
