Comments on: Video hyperlink ads could bring new meaning to product placement http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/ Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:50:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: laling http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-661069 laling Thu, 08 Nov 2007 06:03:59 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-661069 Wow! interesting about this but most interesting for me if we can make video offline for example your AVI home made video embed URL inside the video and make the video hyperlink to landing page.When somebody download the video,watching it just click on video instead manually type the URL.I know we can hyperlink the image picture,text but what about video? Wow! interesting about this but most interesting for me if we can make video offline for example your AVI home made video embed URL inside the video and make the video hyperlink to landing page.When somebody download the video,watching it just click on video instead manually type the URL.I know we can hyperlink the image picture,text but what about video?

]]> By: Make You Go Hmm: » Who will click to play video ads from Google or anybody else? http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-97090 Make You Go Hmm: » Who will click to play video ads from Google or anybody else? Tue, 23 May 2006 11:09:22 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-97090 [...] Would like to actually see the ads around first, but I’m leaning more towards con than pro. I really appreciate Google remembering that users hate intrusive ads. How many people are going to click and watch video ads? Really? Seriously? Arrington makes the point if it is one of those cool ads that everybody wants to see, it will go viral all over YouTube and other video sites without the advertiser needing to pay (listen up, marketing departments). I think something like Microsoft is working on where the ads are content embedded makes much more sense. I would click on some cool Tablet PC being used at the CTU in 24. [...] […] Would like to actually see the ads around first, but I’m leaning more towards con than pro. I really appreciate Google remembering that users hate intrusive ads. How many people are going to click and watch video ads? Really? Seriously? Arrington makes the point if it is one of those cool ads that everybody wants to see, it will go viral all over YouTube and other video sites without the advertiser needing to pay (listen up, marketing departments). I think something like Microsoft is working on where the ads are content embedded makes much more sense. I would click on some cool Tablet PC being used at the CTU in 24. […]

]]> By: Eric Tully http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-54064 Eric Tully Sat, 25 Feb 2006 01:54:01 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-54064 It's interesting to me that everyone automatically thinks in terms of ads. I've been mulling this around in my head and I see lots of creative possibilities. I imagine software that watches to see how many times you press rewind to re-watch a certain part which tells the software what you find interesting. How about How-To video that only elaborates on how to screw in the lightbulb if you click on it... otherwise, the video continues playing, skipping the parts you already know how to do. The software could even begin to notice that you only seem to ask for elaboration on higher skill level topics and so determines that you are an expert. This way, as you watch other programs, they can automatically serve up the audio track that talks at your level. And since these players are networked, they can compare your patterns to other people's patterns and it begins to customize your viewing based on what has seemed to work for other people who are like you. Video doesn't have to be linear - and it doesn't just have to be about buying designer shoes either. It’s interesting to me that everyone automatically thinks in terms of ads. I’ve been mulling this around in my head and I see lots of creative possibilities. I imagine software that watches to see how many times you press rewind to re-watch a certain part which tells the software what you find interesting. How about How-To video that only elaborates on how to screw in the lightbulb if you click on it… otherwise, the video continues playing, skipping the parts you already know how to do. The software could even begin to notice that you only seem to ask for elaboration on higher skill level topics and so determines that you are an expert. This way, as you watch other programs, they can automatically serve up the audio track that talks at your level. And since these players are networked, they can compare your patterns to other people’s patterns and it begins to customize your viewing based on what has seemed to work for other people who are like you.

Video doesn’t have to be linear - and it doesn’t just have to be about buying designer shoes either.

]]> By: Make You Go Hmm: » Burnett + AOL = online Gold Rush game-TV hybrid http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52457 Make You Go Hmm: » Burnett + AOL = online Gold Rush game-TV hybrid Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:39:26 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52457 [...] Recently I lamented the lack of interaction between TV and the internet and how excited I was to learn of Microsoft research hyperlink video technology. Hopefully these shows will be a success and further blur the lines between the internet and television. I think it’s a great trend with lots of upside potential. Otherwise, the most interaction we will continue to receive as viewers is text message voting a la American Idol. There can be so much more interaction. [...] […] Recently I lamented the lack of interaction between TV and the internet and how excited I was to learn of Microsoft research hyperlink video technology. Hopefully these shows will be a success and further blur the lines between the internet and television. I think it’s a great trend with lots of upside potential. Otherwise, the most interaction we will continue to receive as viewers is text message voting a la American Idol. There can be so much more interaction. […]

]]> By: TDavid http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52383 TDavid Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:24:48 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52383 Shay - I checked out your URL and it just led to a broken graphic. Have a better link? Shay - I checked out your URL and it just led to a broken graphic. Have a better link?

]]> By: Shay http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52380 Shay Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:15:18 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-52380 I read you article on the example, viewers of “Sex and the City” could click on Carrie Bradshaw’s designer shoes check this out we build it for AOL/HBO in 2001 I read you article on the example, viewers of “Sex and the City” could click on Carrie Bradshaw’s designer shoes

check this out we build it for AOL/HBO in 2001

]]> By: Sterling Camden http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-50337 Sterling Camden Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:53:29 +0000 http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/#comment-50337 Pingback: "Wherefore Art Thou, Technology?" http://www.chipstips.com/microblog/index.php?comment=18 Pingback: “Wherefore Art Thou, Technology?” http://www.chipstips.com/microblog/index.php?comment=18

]]>