type in your query to search makeyougohmm
Things that ... make you go hmmtechnology music video art news reviews and muse on the web

January 14, 2006

Video hyperlink ads could bring new meaning to product placement

television, finance — by TDavid @ 2:04 am PST

One thing disappointing to date has been the amount of true internet and TV interaction. Sure, we have things like the Sony Connect, SlingBox and Media Center which offer various ways to import and view the signal and there are PVRs which allow us to timeshift the programming. However to date, the creativity in actually bridging mouseclicks and programming has been at best underwhelming and worst clumsy and unreliable. Hold the remotes, because at least somebody out there is feeling this emptiness too.

Already thinking here comes another Google ad idea? Think again. Oddly, the company responsible isn’t exactly well known for its innovative prowess: Microsoft.

Seattle PI: Microsoft hopes to cash in with click-on ads

Now, Microsoft is hoping to expand on the concept with a new technology that allows viewers to click on cars, clothing or other products that appear in online movies or TV shows. For example, viewers of “Sex and the City” could click on Carrie Bradshaw’s designer shoes or Kamali sweaters as she walks down a New York street and immediately be transported to advertisements for those products.

One thing I like about the concept of these video hyperlink ads — and I’m making an assumption here because I haven’t actually seen any of them (meaning I could turn around and say they totally suck in the future) — is that they seem to be passive to the users. Meaning if viewers don’t want to see where to buy the car or clothes or shoes displayed on screen, we don’t have to click on them. Hopefully they aren’t popping up or flashing when we fast forward through them.

Now as long as we’re not going to see annoying arrows and hover over text getting in the way of the experience, this seems like a really appealing way to advertise and be advertised to while watching TV.

My problem at the moment with this is here we are with another wait and see, pun not intended, technology from Microsoft. Apparently this is part of adCenter which I’ve just begun to get involve with myself so I can’t really say where specifically these video hyperlink ads will be available. It seems this will be just another part of the adCenter deployment chain (?) which finally has started opening up to more folks in the US.

Also, they obviously rely on people watching videos through their computer which means people with plain old TVs — of which currently greatly outnumber PCs being used for watching TV (somebody please correct me if this is wrong) — won’t be able to partake in this experience without some other type of interface. Could this be where a cable box or satellite receiver adds this type functionality?

Oooo, that brings on many possibilities, doesn’t it?

Microsoft’s presspass explains who is behind adCenter adLab:

The adLab will be headed jointly by Ying Li, Ph.D., of Microsoft adCenter in Redmond and Jian Wang, Ph.D., of Microsoft Research Asia in Beijing, and will consist of a team of dedicated scientists with specializations in the areas of data mining, information retrieval, statistical analysis, artificial intelligence, auction theory, visual computing and digital media. Together, this group of internationally renowned researchers has published more than 80 articles on a range of topics including information retrieval, data mining, visual computing and smart devices.

This is an impressive set of skills, but when, when, when will this become commonplace in our living rooms? The billion dollar question, as impatient and petulant as ever. This video hyperlink technology was demoed at Microsoft’s adCenter Demo Fest. The ‘coming soon’ story from Microsoft might be continuting, but this chapter could have some serious potential. What do you think?

In more ways than one, stay tuned.

Did this post make you go hmm?

F = please no more posts like thisD = not among your best stuffC = average postB = good post, I liked itA = great post, please create more like this (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)

Loading ... Loading ...

Maybe Related Posts (plugin generated)

RSS Feed comments for this post 7 Comments »

  1. Pingback: “Wherefore Art Thou, Technology?” http://www.chipstips.com/microblog/index.php?comment=18

    Comment by Sterling Camden — January 17, 2006 @ 1:53 pm PST

  2. I read you article on the example, viewers of “Sex and the City” could click on Carrie Bradshaw’s designer shoes

    check this out we build it for AOL/HBO in 2001

    Comment by Shay — January 30, 2006 @ 11:15 am PST

  3. Shay - I checked out your URL and it just led to a broken graphic. Have a better link?

    Comment by TDavid — January 30, 2006 @ 11:24 am PST

  4. […] Recently I lamented the lack of interaction between TV and the internet and how excited I was to learn of Microsoft research hyperlink video technology. Hopefully these shows will be a success and further blur the lines between the internet and television. I think it’s a great trend with lots of upside potential. Otherwise, the most interaction we will continue to receive as viewers is text message voting a la American Idol. There can be so much more interaction. […]

    Pingback by Make You Go Hmm: » Burnett + AOL = online Gold Rush game-TV hybrid — February 2, 2006 @ 11:39 am PST

  5. It’s interesting to me that everyone automatically thinks in terms of ads. I’ve been mulling this around in my head and I see lots of creative possibilities. I imagine software that watches to see how many times you press rewind to re-watch a certain part which tells the software what you find interesting. How about How-To video that only elaborates on how to screw in the lightbulb if you click on it… otherwise, the video continues playing, skipping the parts you already know how to do. The software could even begin to notice that you only seem to ask for elaboration on higher skill level topics and so determines that you are an expert. This way, as you watch other programs, they can automatically serve up the audio track that talks at your level. And since these players are networked, they can compare your patterns to other people’s patterns and it begins to customize your viewing based on what has seemed to work for other people who are like you.

    Video doesn’t have to be linear - and it doesn’t just have to be about buying designer shoes either.

    Comment by Eric Tully — February 24, 2006 @ 8:54 pm PST

  6. […] Would like to actually see the ads around first, but I’m leaning more towards con than pro. I really appreciate Google remembering that users hate intrusive ads. How many people are going to click and watch video ads? Really? Seriously? Arrington makes the point if it is one of those cool ads that everybody wants to see, it will go viral all over YouTube and other video sites without the advertiser needing to pay (listen up, marketing departments). I think something like Microsoft is working on where the ads are content embedded makes much more sense. I would click on some cool Tablet PC being used at the CTU in 24. […]

    Pingback by Make You Go Hmm: » Who will click to play video ads from Google or anybody else? — May 23, 2006 @ 6:09 am PST

  7. Wow! interesting about this but most interesting for me if we can make video offline for example your AVI home made video embed URL inside the video and make the video hyperlink to landing page.When somebody download the video,watching it just click on video instead manually type the URL.I know we can hyperlink the image picture,text but what about video?

    Comment by laling — November 7, 2007 @ 10:03 pm PST


TrackBack URI: http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20060114/2849/trackback/

Leave a comment


By leaving a comment you consent to the Official Hmm Comment Policy

Return Home



Copyright 2003-2008 KMR Enterprises All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy