AOL buys WeblogsInc, but what about the writers? |
I know, I know, starting to sound like that hysterical lady on the Simpsons always crying: “but what about the children?!”
Didn’t I just write a couple weeks ago that the primary people in blog networks who make money are the network owners? Time to applaud Jason Calacanis and Brian Alvey, congratulations guys! And that’s meant earnestly. They did their job as business owners. From a business owner perspective, I’m impressed and wish them the best.
From a writer’s perspective, I’m worried.
Although I haven’t read through every blog post on the acquistion, something I haven’t noticed a single blogger mention yet — I just can’t be the only person to wonder this amidst the flurry of virtual blogger high fives — I sure hope the writers get a raise out of this deal.
Paul Cheney is curious too: “I used to blog for WIN. If Calacanis splits his bounty with his bloggers, I’m sure I’m going to wish I still did. (Maybe he’ll grandfather me in. Nah, probably not.)”
According to various sources Weblogsinc (WIN), which may or may not (unknown) include its proprietary blog software Blogsmith, have been sold for an as yet to be disclosed amount (Reuters reports it as $25 million).
Rafat Ali is breaking the story that WeblogsInc, which includes blogs like Engadget and one of my favorites: Cinematical, is being bought by AOL:
paidContent.org has learned from multiple sources. The deal is done and should be announced this week…(Updated: it might be announced tomorrow AM now.) Among the other companies Weblogs Inc talked to included the usual suspects: News Corp, Yahoo and MSN…
Speculation of purchase price range from $20 - $35 million. Pocket change for AOL. But what about the writers? Does AOL come in and give an across the board raise? Does the competitive wage Calacanis said he strived for ever come to fruituion after this deal?
Ali doesn’t name the various sources and there doesn’t appear as of this writing anyway to be any official word yet from either camp — note the quote above says “might be announced tomorrow AM now” — but a lot of people are writing as if the deal is already inked and closed, so I sure hope this doesn’t turn out like Microsoft single DVD story which was bogus (and thankfully I didn’t blog that one).
Also pointed out by Ali, this is the second company Calacanis has sold in the last two years. With all this foolish bubble-like talk about Web 2.0, maybe that’s one defining characteristic: build stuff so it can be bought by bigger, richer fish. That is at least one business strategy anyway. I still believe that this is the strategy of Technorati, but unfortunately for Sifry and company nobody seems to be biting, at their price tag anyway.
I’m going to digest this proposed deal for a little longer, continuing to read what others have to say and wait for the official word before expanding too much deeper on my thoughts (although you can guess by the title and theme throughout this entry what players I’m concerned about).
Generally speaking, though, I’ve always been fond of AOL’s writing areas. I do not really care for AOL the company, but I’ve always held the AOL writing areas in high regard like their keyword: novel area which I used to work for (er, volunteeer for, should I say?) as a NOVL back in the 90’s. I can definitely see why AOL would be interested in buying a blog network.
Around the web
Software Only congratulates Jason and the team and adds that Wondir has also been acquired by a new healthcare startup.
Russell Buckley thinks Weblogsinc isn’t worth the money: “…my bet is Jason has cannily sold out at the top of the market. It’s yet another sign of the bubble that’s going on.”
The Stalwart notes a prophetic Jason Calacanis quote to Jeff Jarvis from May 2004: “When pressed by Jeff Jarvis, the moderator, to say how his latest company would make him, Calacanis said: ‘$20-30m — and this time I’m going to take the money.’”
Anita Campbell puts her finger on why these network of niche blogs exist: And there you were, wondering ‘what is the point of all those networks of niche blog sites that keep popping up?’ The answer: why, to sell them to some big media company, of course.”
Paradox1x: “They have built an online media empire and are a template that hordes of others are following.”
Susan Mernit thinks the deal makes sense and explains why and sends along her congrats.
A few bloggers mentioned that Gawker Media might be for sale too.
Nick Denton slays those rumours: “For what it’s worth, Gawker isn’t for sale. The whole point about blogs is that they’re not part of big media. Consolidation defeats the purpose. It’s way too early.”
Did this post make you go hmm?
Related Posts
- Calacanis has Dear Abby aspirations
- More blog network negativity circulating over WeblogsInc
automated“Best of” posts - Engadget expanding, adding labs starting Oct 15
- Pimping the blogosphere — good or evil?
- Google News: please don’t drown us!
- Hmm Interview #2: Jeremy Wright from B5 Media




Bubble 2.0: Who wins, who loses?
Mike at Techdirt calls today’s AOL/Weblogs Inc. deal (see my earlier post) “The Real Blog Bubble”, which sounds about right to me. And he has the same suspicions I did:
Also, to be watched, is how this impacts all of Weblogs Inc. au…
Trackback by Ed Bott's Windows Expertise — October 6, 2005 @ 3:40 pm PST
You know, it’s hilarious: everyone’s worried about the WIN writers, except for (drumroll, please)…the WIN Writers!
Imagine that.
Comment by The Zero Boss — October 6, 2005 @ 6:05 pm PST
Here’s a name for you to imagine, The Zero Boss: Nullsoft.
Comment by TDavid — October 6, 2005 @ 6:27 pm PST
Hey, I’m not saying that can’t happen, TDavid. Who knows where this will be in a year or two? I’m just amused at the supposed concern cropping up from everyone *but* the people involved in the deal.
Comment by The Zero Boss — October 6, 2005 @ 6:35 pm PST
Those working for WIN and counting on that money to eat will not voice anything but support for this until and/or if they feel directly compromised (or after quitting over it). In the meantime, fortunately there are plenty of folks out here who do not work for WIN or AOL that can speak with complete candor about the situation.
All I’m saying really is I hope the writers get touched up here too. If they don’t, then it’s more of the same: publishers getting fat, artists living off the leftovers. Someday, hopefully, this significant disequity between artists and publishers will end. I believe that the ease by which the web makes it so anybody can be a publisher is a step in the right direction of better profit distribution.
I’m not saying publishers shouldn’t make money, no way, I’m simply saying artists should make more than they are currently making.
There is plenty of money to go around and it would have been nice to hear that for once writers are getting a raise, even if it was only a small one out of this deal. $25 million is a lot of money. Heck, $130,000 of that is an extra $1,000 bonus to each writer. Small, but very meaningful bonus to the writers.
Hey, it’s no skin off my nose. I’m not a WIN writer, but tell me seriously who would turn a bonus like that away?
Bookmark this post and then come back and comment in six months on this one after you have more data. Will be easy to trumphet how truly happy the writers are about that then. And I’ll be more than happy to post at that time saying how happy I am that AOL didn’t wreck WIN.
Comment by TDavid — October 6, 2005 @ 7:52 pm PST
Why blog networks are worth millions
It had been bugging me all throughout yesterday. Why are blog networks suddenly worth millions ? Well, last night, around 2 am (I’m a night owl and I work best at night - by about 8 am I’ve de-evo…
Trackback by The PC Doctor — October 7, 2005 @ 6:59 am PST