<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debating what is/isn&#8217;t spam in comments sections</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050928/2433/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Why nofollow continues to be against the spirit of the web &#187; Make You Go Hmm</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050928/2433/#comment-414669</link>
		<author>Why nofollow continues to be against the spirit of the web &#187; Make You Go Hmm</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050928/2433/#comment-414669</guid>
		<description>[...] Past Hmm posts about the nofollow attribute December 13, 2006: The FTC and somebody please give me something positive to write about Sony September 28, 2005: Debating what is/isn&#8217;t spam in the comment sections September 26, 2006: TypePad offers tip jar feature, still forcing rel=nofollow on all comments? March 15, 2005: Disabling nofollow in Wordpress 1.5 Jan 22, 2005: Google responds to my nofollow concerns Jan 19, 2005: Treating all commenters like spammers is a slippery slope Jan 15, 2005: No Google juice for nofollow attribute, will this negatively impact legitimate comment activity? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Past Hmm posts about the nofollow attribute December 13, 2006: The FTC and somebody please give me something positive to write about Sony September 28, 2005: Debating what is/isn&#8217;t spam in the comment sections September 26, 2006: TypePad offers tip jar feature, still forcing rel=nofollow on all comments? March 15, 2005: Disabling nofollow in Wordpress 1.5 Jan 22, 2005: Google responds to my nofollow concerns Jan 19, 2005: Treating all commenters like spammers is a slippery slope Jan 15, 2005: No Google juice for nofollow attribute, will this negatively impact legitimate comment activity? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050928/2433/#comment-24157</link>
		<author>Andrew Ferguson</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 01:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050928/2433/#comment-24157</guid>
		<description>I accept every comment, except for spam. The one caveat is that you must use your real name (first name is fine) when you leave a comment. I consider comment spam to be text that is not unique (i.e., I could search Google and get 100 results for the exact same string).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accept every comment, except for spam. The one caveat is that you must use your real name (first name is fine) when you leave a comment. I consider comment spam to be text that is not unique (i.e., I could search Google and get 100 results for the exact same string).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
