<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wednesday rumour: Google to release IM client</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050822/2268/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Markoff: Google &#8220;Communication Tool&#8221; On Wednesday&#160;&#160;InsideGoogle - part of the Blog News Channel</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050822/2268/#comment-15917</link>
		<author>&#187; Markoff: Google &#8220;Communication Tool&#8221; On Wednesday&#160;&#160;InsideGoogle - part of the Blog News Channel</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050822/2268/#comment-15917</guid>
		<description>[...] Make You Go Hmm says: In my opinion Google should skip releasing a standalone IM client. They sort of already have IM capability with Hello (although that’s a part of their picture service). Instead, they should go after and buy Skype — or something like it, maybe — for something that has chat and IMO the more valuable voice services.   Posted: 8/22/2005 by Nathan Weinberg in: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Make You Go Hmm says: In my opinion Google should skip releasing a standalone IM client. They sort of already have IM capability with Hello (although that’s a part of their picture service). Instead, they should go after and buy Skype — or something like it, maybe — for something that has chat and IMO the more valuable voice services.   Posted: 8/22/2005 by Nathan Weinberg in: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
