<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia tightens the editorial screws</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050806/2201/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Anon users barred from creating new Wikipedia articles</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050806/2201/#comment-42367</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Anon users barred from creating new Wikipedia articles</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050806/2201/#comment-42367</guid>
		<description>[...] These changes were a reaction to two recent issues with the system and piggyback on Wikipedia issues cited last month and general policies and procedures Wales said they were looking into back in August. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] These changes were a reaction to two recent issues with the system and piggyback on Wikipedia issues cited last month and general policies and procedures Wales said they were looking into back in August. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Wikipedia battles with itself</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050806/2201/#comment-28349</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Wikipedia battles with itself</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050806/2201/#comment-28349</guid>
		<description>[...] Bottom line, what I wrote almost three months ago on wikis has only been further reinforced by Wales comments in Orlowski&#8217;s article. I wrote: Put me in the group who doesn’t have faith in the wiki model (sorry, wiki fans). Yeah, the Wikipedia is cool and a few other wikis that are well policed but the vast majority of them end up vandalized. Sad, but true. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Bottom line, what I wrote almost three months ago on wikis has only been further reinforced by Wales comments in Orlowski&#8217;s article. I wrote: Put me in the group who doesn’t have faith in the wiki model (sorry, wiki fans). Yeah, the Wikipedia is cool and a few other wikis that are well policed but the vast majority of them end up vandalized. Sad, but true. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
