Sharebuilder rocks! |
You’ve probably seen green Sharebuilder ads like the one above below around various websites (the Associate Press runs these ads) and recently these were added here to the banner rotator above and in the Finance category. Before adding these, I’ve spent the last couple months checking out the service myself. Sharebuilder is based out of Bellevue, Washington, which is very close to Microsoft headquarters in Redmond.
A few months ago, I clicked through on one of those advertisements from another site and then posted here asking other readers if they had any personal experience with the site/service. I received five positive and no negative comments.

I decided to allocate a small amount of money each month and sign up for Sharebuilder to run an experiment using their program investing in a few recommended tech stocks. Above is a screenshot showing the overall percentage result of this portfolio. Sorry, I’ve removed the actual money invested but I may share the actual dollar figures after a year or so has gone by so that folks can see in fact that my investment outlay has been minimal and that enough time has passed to fairly judge the return of the investments over time. I’ve gotten on a cycle and dilligently invested once a month the same amount. To date, 80% of the funds allocated have gone to primarily well known tech stocks and 20% to a low risk money market account. I’m doing the 20% so that even if the stocks completely tank, I’ll have some money left. Nobody likes to lose it all.
The neat thing about Sharebuilder is that one can, indeed, invest as little as a few dollars (although admittedly I haven’t tried the smallest advertised amount of $4) so you can buy small parts of a stock instead of full shares. This means one could own a small slice of GOOGle for less than the price of taking a loved one to see Star Wars Revenge of the Sith in the theater.
Our traditional broker requires minimum stock trades of a lot more dollars than this. The catch? Surely, there’s a catch somewhere, right? That’s what I figured too. Here’s how it works:
In order to make those $4 trades you would need to pay $4 fee per investment or pay for one of their monthly plans (plans shown below, current as of this post, but subject to change, so consult Sharebuilder directly for actual figures):

If you choose say the $12/month plan then you would be able t make 6 trades as part of your monthly plan fee (and each additional trade beyond six would cost $2 each). Therefore, under this plan you could essentially make six $4 trades each month or whatever cycle you want to choose. You could buy one stock each week and that would be four or five trades for the month depending on the number of Tuesdays. Divide the six trades into $12 and that works out to $2 per trade.
If you invested $10 then that’s a 20% fee. If you invested $100 then that’s a 2% fee. Before thinking this is too pricey, consider the last time you pulled money out of an ATM and had to pay for that privilege (that’s more outrageous, IMO). Probably paid $1-2.50 there for pulling out your own money. The fees here work out to be very similar.
Sharebuilder also offers a premium $20/month plan that gives investors up to 20 trades a month at a $1 a trade, which lowers the percentage to 10% on the $10 investment or 1% on a $100 investment. It’s all relative. 20 trades is a lot though if one is just starting out investing.
The new or first time investor would probably be better off with the 6 trade program at $12/month and choosing a few stocks that they feel have strong earnings potential. Heck, if it’s a husband/wife team then each can choose 3 stocks to purchase each month and then make a friendly competition out of who does better. Marriage and competition, gotta love that!
Now, just paying the $12/month and not investing would be a bad investment in and of itself, so if one is reading this and signs up, then make a committment to invest in something, whatever the amount is and do it consistently every week or month so that the 12 bones is not going down the proverbial rathole.
It’s not just the $12, though, one would be looking at in the budget. If making say six $5 investments every month then that would be $30/month. So the total investment cost each month would be $42 USD ($12 /month for the plan + 6 investments x $5 = 30 for a total of $42). So it is quite possible to make six stock investments for under $50 a month which is the standard minimum figure to buy into most automatic investment plans (mutual funds often start out at this figure with many large brokerage firms).
It can be an automatic investment like I am doing or you can pick and choose what week on Tuesday you want to invest — though you are stuck with not knowing the exact price you will pay on the Tuesday that the trade is actually made as Ter explains:
Yeah, the reason it’s four bucks is that it’s not a real-time trade, but is made at some point each Tuesday. So you can’t predict exactly what you will pay. It’s a lot like direct reinvestment plans, where you are buying in dollar amount, not share numbers.
Guess the major question is if I was losing 20% instead of being ahead 20% would I be as happy with the service? I wouldn’t be happy about losing the money, no, but it’s not Sharebuilder that is determining the percentage gained or loss, it’s the investments I have chosen. As with anything else, an investor has to choose wisely.
I decided to invest in the stocks S&P Equity research had put a “buy” rating on in March of this year. I only invested in ValueClick (VCLK) one month and as you can see above, it has been the only underperformer in the portfolio. The second month I replaced ValueClick with one stock that they didn’t recommend: Apple, which has done ok so far. I’m holding onto ValueClick and might buy more again someday. Upon closer inspection, though, I saw Commission Junction (CJ) is one of their businesses and I’m not a CJ fan, so maybe not.
If you had bought these same stocks and invested at the same week I did March, April and May, you’d have the same returns shown above. Yeah, it’s only three months and three months from now it could be -20% or worse, that’s the way it goes.
Nobody likes losing money, but I consider this money spent as sort of an online gambling fund of sorts. Therefore, I’m willing to risk losing a large portion of it, and maybe even all of it (though the chance of that happening with the chosen stocks is very small). That’s the attitude, IMO, that one has to have with these type of higher risk investments. The stock market can be very, very risky and I sure wouldn’t trust having too much money there. I don’t put my eggs all in one basket as an investor and neither should anybody else. But, for an experiment, perhaps even a very fun, educational one, Sharebuilder could be the ticket.
Disclaimer: certainly Sharebuilder shouldn’t be anybody’s only investment channel, just as it far and away isn’t mine nor should anything I’ve written here be construed as investment advice. Also, I do make a few bucks if you sign up for Sharebuilder by clicking one of these ads and investing a few dollars so keep that in mind. Although, I am paying for and using this service myself every month, so that makes me at the very least an informed shill
When it comes time to sell the stocks one has purchased those trades are, again, real time and will incur the real time fees according to the plan shown above, which can make the commission structure higher. The idea with saving though is to do exactly that: save. It’s difficult to make money if one is constantly moving money around and having gains being devoured by commission fees. And the convenience of a savings account can also be its undoing when one needs a few extra bucks. Those real time commission fees might be just the deterrent one needs to stay away from selling and withdrawing the funds for a probably unnecessary expenditure.
With all this said, if someone reading this wants to dip a toe in with a small amount of money I can personally say that this service is one possible good place to start. I was definitely a little bit concerned and skeptical initially because you have to be careful when it comes to money, but those fears are gone; the service has been solid — at least on the buying end — for me so far. Since I haven’t sold any of my investments I cannot speak to that experience yet. I will write when I have sold the stocks and withdrawn the money, but I suspect that will not be for quite some time.
Related Posts- $25 USD for friends/family to buy stock through Sharebuilder
- Stock trade commissions declining, a buck a trade good for investors
- Paying first Zecco commissions, taking first loss
- Zecco free trades going away, unless you have $2,500 minimum balance
- Couldn’t buy Xbox 360, could buy more GOOGle stock
- 2007 stock competition results and free real time stock quotes



(1 votes, average: 4 out of 5)

[…] I use Sharebuilder for some smaller stock purchases and experimentation buying (mostly) tech sector stocks which is explained in more depth via the post Sharebuilder Rocks! To summarize, I’ve been very happy with my stock trades to date, but again it is very important to note that stock contains risk and investors can and do lose money all the time. In this case, a friend/family member could lose the $25 Sharebuilder is giving which seems like fairly low risk investing, at least for those twenty five bones. […]
Pingback by Make You Go Hmm: » $25 USD for friends/family to buy stock through Sharebuilder — August 27, 2005 @ 11:58 am PST
I love Sharebuilder too, but have been unable to open the website the past couple of weeks. Anyone else haveing that problem.
Drew
Comment by Andrew — November 14, 2005 @ 6:00 am PST
Drew - I visit there at least a few times a week, no problems accessing here. Just give them a call if you have any trouble, the few times I’ve called Sharebuilder about anything they’ve been very helpful.
Comment by TDavid — November 14, 2005 @ 12:04 pm PST
Yes, sharebuilder is SUPER. I would have to say that sharebuilder.com is an excellent way to start investing. I just did a presentation for my E-commerce class about sharebuilder and online investing a few weeks ago. I have been investing with sharebuilder for 10 months now and I don’t have a single complaint to date.
Comment by Jonathan — December 7, 2005 @ 1:15 am PST
[…] One of the things I don’t like about Sharebuilder [review here], which offers making trades of partial stocks and that is advertised around this blog are the higher commission fees. The minimum fee, even if you are at their highest subscription level is $11.95 USD. If you add that to the monthly fees you pay as a subscriber ($20/month for the advantage, $12/month for the standard and free for the basic), which the paid plans are optional, it makes the deal far less attractive for trading smaller amounts of full/partial stock. This would be the catch, I guess, and the reason I haven’t traded any stocks I’ve bought through Sharebuilder. […]
Pingback by Make You Go Hmm: » Stock trade commissions declining, a buck a trade good for investors — July 12, 2006 @ 11:42 am PST
I think you need to consider how much you are investing to determine the “Deal” you are getting. If you are only investing $100 total per month then a $20 fee is 20% right off the top. If you are investing $1000 then its 2%. But keep in mind that with a $20 monthly fee to keep that at 2% you would need to keep investing $1000 every month ,$12,000 per year invested, with $240 in fees. So now lets say you pick stocks that when combined net you 10% or $1200 (and that is a very good return on average). Now assume 25% income tax and subtract the $240 in fees only nets you about $700, on a $12,000 dollar investment. If you only invest $100 per month with the $20 deal you actually loose money even with a 10% gain on the stocks. All this assumes you make a 10% profit on your stock picks. So unless you are really good at picking stocks, or even if your are, get a 401K, leverage the benefits of employer matching and pre-tax contributions.
Comment by bd — July 22, 2006 @ 9:30 pm PST
For a good argument against Sharebuilder go to http://thenewmoney.wordpress.com/2006/01/22/sharebuilder-review/. I used to invest with Sharebuilder but have since went with Scottrade.
Comment by LCW — February 8, 2007 @ 12:21 pm PST
First of all, make sure that if you think the fees are “low,” that they really are for you — as it will depend on how much you can afford to invest each month. Depending on that, it could be quite a high percentage fee. Second, make sure you don’t need customer service. I have been a customer for about 2-3 years — and when I had a serious problem in not being able to access my account, I found the customer service so slow, unhelpful, and uncaring that I am looking to move. It would be one thing if everything worked seamlessly and the fees were the best — but neither is the case. I have also had other problems, such as not being able to access my tax documents; and a bank as common and prevalent as Wells Fargo gives me a number of no-fee transactions per year. Given that, who needs Sharebuilder’s attitude?
Comment by Garner Weng — March 12, 2007 @ 4:29 pm PST
First off, i’ve been using sharebuilder for over 2 years, and I started back when I knew nothing about stocks and would only make an occassional trade every few months and was lured in by their user friendly appearance. I’ve since switched to tradeking and now I can look back and see how bad sharebuilder really is. First off, the price per trade is $15.95, not the $4 they advertise everywhere. The $4 only applies is your subscribed to some kind of automatic monthly investment program they have. The most outrageous feature they have is the fact that you need to pay $4.95 a month just to have access to basic features such as a P/L tracker. Tradeking on the other hands charges a no gimmick 4.95 per trade and all the charts and trackers for free that sharebuilder charges a monthly fee for. No, i don’t work for tradeking, i’m just really, really happy I switched to them.
Comment by Gunnar — September 26, 2007 @ 7:15 am PST
Back when I wrote this review Zecco (max 10 free trades a day, 40 free trades a month) wasn’t around, Gunnar. My wife and I are using them for our stock competition and liking them so far. The interface is clumsy, but free trades aren’t a gimmick.
I still have an account with Sharebuilder but agree with you that they need to bring their prices down and add more features. If Zecco adds partial shares, I’ll probably transfer the portfolio to them.
Comment by TDavid — September 26, 2007 @ 7:44 am PST
Careful about real-time trades with these guys. I just paid over $100 dollars in commission on a real-time trade due to their large order surcharge. Their customer service says “In addition to the base commission, a large order surcharge of $0.015 for each additional share over 1,000 shares will be incurred. The total commission (base commission + surcharge) is subject to a maximum of 2.5 percent of the principal, but no less than the base commission.”
In my mind that translates into a rip-off for large orders. No more real-time trades through sharebuilder for me!
Comment by dave — September 22, 2008 @ 3:16 pm PST