<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedburner won&#8217;t burn users on the way out</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050611/2008/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Feedburner not disallowing use of old feeds to third parties?</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050611/2008/#comment-198277</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm: &#187; Feedburner not disallowing use of old feeds to third parties?</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 11:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050611/2008/#comment-198277</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;ve used the service Feedburner somewhat sparingly across a few of our blogs. Overall, I&#8217;ve been happy with the service. I resisted the idea of using them for the main feeds here simply because I didn&#8217;t like the idea of offloading the primary feed to a third party. Yes, it can be done silently in the background with some backend redirection and Feedburner is good about graceful exit plans (see: Feedburner won&#8217;t burn you on the way out), but most folks won&#8217;t bother. In fact, some folks will delete a feed and create a new one without concern for what happens to the old feed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] We&#8217;ve used the service Feedburner somewhat sparingly across a few of our blogs. Overall, I&#8217;ve been happy with the service. I resisted the idea of using them for the main feeds here simply because I didn&#8217;t like the idea of offloading the primary feed to a third party. Yes, it can be done silently in the background with some backend redirection and Feedburner is good about graceful exit plans (see: Feedburner won&#8217;t burn you on the way out), but most folks won&#8217;t bother. In fact, some folks will delete a feed and create a new one without concern for what happens to the old feed. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rolandog</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050611/2008/#comment-7489</link>
		<author>rolandog</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050611/2008/#comment-7489</guid>
		<description>Well, it's really nice of them to allow time for the transition. Then again, some users, like me, may not use their feed readers frequently... in my case, I haven't used it in a month or so! Then again, that's my fault, and reading your post reminded me that I need to stop surfing for a while... =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s really nice of them to allow time for the transition. Then again, some users, like me, may not use their feed readers frequently&#8230; in my case, I haven&#8217;t used it in a month or so! Then again, that&#8217;s my fault, and reading your post reminded me that I need to stop surfing for a while&#8230; =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
