Verizon CEO flames Wi-Fi and demanding customers |
We might expect a Verizon CEO to be lukewarm on the concept of city wide free or low cost Wi-Fi, but the quotes in this story from sfgate with the CEO could very well aggravate some Verizon customers (it rubbed me wrong):
“That could be one of the dumbest ideas I’ve ever heard,” said Ivan Seidenberg, chief executive officer of Verizon Communications, during a meeting with Chronicle editors and writers on Friday. “It sounds like a good thing, but the trouble is someone will have to design it, someone will have to upgrade it, someone will have to maintain it and someone will have to run it.”
So who cares about San Francisco except the people in San Francisco, right? Wrong. There’s an old saying: the fish stinks at the head. And as a Verizon customer, I’m smelling some stinky fish with these comments.
But it’s not enough for Seidenberg to stop at flaming free or low cost City Wide Wi-Fi, he then aims his sights on those terrible, annoying, demanding customers (sarcasm) complaining about cell dark spots:
“Why in the world would you think your (cell) phone would work in your house?” he said. “The customer has come to expect so much. They want it to work in the elevator; they want it to work in the basement.”
Wow, this guy has some mega-huge stones! I’ve never been a huge phone company fan and would use 100% VoIP if we we wouldn’t lose our established business number (no, it’s not transferable). We threw the phone company out in our home over a year ago and life has been better without their monopolistic charges and constant fiddling with local long distance rates.
“You’re getting the best deal!” They’d tell us, and then we’d talk to someone else and they were getting a better deal than us. We’d call up and complain (not to Verizon, to our prior carrier) and we’d get the lower rate. Crooked!
Thank goodness we’ve switched like 90% of our phone business to VoIP. We do have Verizon becaue its considerably less expensive than OnStar phone minutes — but when our two-year contract is up, I hope to be able to go EDO in this area and wave goodbye (again) to cell phone service. We went a couple months without cell service and it wasn’t the end of the world and I’m confident we could do it again if we could use VoiP through an EDO.
Just a few of the things I don’t like about Verizon: you can’t limit the amount of minutes on an account. We gave our oldest teenager a phone for mostly emergencies and we wanted to limit his access — not possible unless we physically take away the phone. The technology is there to lock it down, but no way do the cell carriers want to offer their customers features like this. Also, you can’t shut down their downloadable pay content. Talk about an open checkbook!
Yeah, we plan to be getting rid of your cell phone service, Mr. Seidenberg. You don’t need us customers at all, we’re just an inconvenience to people like you. The only real question I have is if Seidenberg will still be their CEO when our two year contract is up?
Dan Gillmor is dead on with his title for this story: Jerk CEOs Part 12,434.
Related Posts- Comcast offers Cable TV, VoIP and Internet bundle for $99/month
- Stolen cell phone watcher
- Will eBay extend free Skype to Phone calls in US into 2007?
- TiVo $150 early termination fee
- AT&T adds more VoIP service to business customers
- Cell phone replacement with Vonage WiFi someday a reality




[…] sure use a Scoble blogging, especially after their CEO makes wild, unnecessary statements like this. If one is only looking at the numbers it sure appears like Steve Jobs and Apple thumbing t […]
Pingback by Make You Go Hmm: » I’m buying Apple instead of Microsoft stock — April 18, 2005 @ 9:56 am PST
What Seidenberg failed to mention is that subscribers - both individual and business - have options to enable wireless coverage where their cell phones and wireless devices are used most – indoors. No matter how good the outdoor macro network coverage is, indoor coverage is always going to be an issue due to building materials and location - it’s just not RF friendly. This issue will become more prevelant especially as more Americans “cut the cord” and go completely wireless. If wireless carriers are counting on this cutting the cord trend to continue, coverage at home will have to be addressed. More than price or functionality, coverage is subscribers want – and they aren’t always getting it.
Despite Seidenberg’s comments, carriers like Verizon Wireless ARE working with vendors that specialize in indoor coverage to ensure their customers to have coverage where they use their wireless devices the most – at home and at work. Carriers can’t afford to provide coverage in every home across America, but consumers and enterprises are now realizing there are carrier-approved solutions available that they can purchase to improve their indoor wireless coverage problems and maximize their wireless service plan.
Comment by Connie — April 19, 2005 @ 8:45 am PST
[…] ile business executives! First the Verizon CEO shows how out of touch with reality he is, Verizon CEO flames Wi-Fi and demanding customers, and now Apple pulls a publishers tech books from the […]
Pingback by Blog-A-Rama » Blog Archive » Steve Jobs has lost all perspective! — April 28, 2005 @ 9:29 am PST
Verizon tries to do anything to get more press. I mean they are already one of the biggest high speed internet providers in the world and they just try to steal all the attention!
Comment by john — November 9, 2007 @ 4:09 am PST