<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experiment reveals how fast Google News links breaking news</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1194</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Jon - &lt;strike&gt;the news is Flickr being bought by Yahoo story. My personal comments regarding the changing of a Scripting News post with certain comments being made is ancilliary and more of a just FYI thing. Maybe that should have been put in a separate post ...&lt;/strike&gt;

As I re-read my comments above, I think you are simply  pointing out that there's no point in Scripting News being scanned because of the length, so just ignore the paragraph I wrote above (lol).

Michael, thanks for posting that info. I do remember hearing something about this before, but it's nice to get some clarification on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon - <strike>the news is Flickr being bought by Yahoo story. My personal comments regarding the changing of a Scripting News post with certain comments being made is ancilliary and more of a just FYI thing. Maybe that should have been put in a separate post &#8230;</strike></p>
<p>As I re-read my comments above, I think you are simply  pointing out that there&#8217;s no point in Scripting News being scanned because of the length, so just ignore the paragraph I wrote above (lol).</p>
<p>Michael, thanks for posting that info. I do remember hearing something about this before, but it&#8217;s nice to get some clarification on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Gales</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1153</link>
		<author>Jon Gales</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>It would be silly for Google News to scan Scripting News--he posts very very short items, often without news relevance. Why is a link flame contest with any number of people news to Google?

No one big picked up the Flickr story for a bit because it's a Sunday and because it was announced via a blog post, not via a press release. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be silly for Google News to scan Scripting News&#8211;he posts very very short items, often without news relevance. Why is a link flame contest with any number of people news to Google?</p>
<p>No one big picked up the Flickr story for a bit because it&#8217;s a Sunday and because it was announced via a blog post, not via a press release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hanscom</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1149</link>
		<author>Michael Hanscom</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 06:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20050320/1595/#comment-1149</guid>
		<description>&#62; Usually bloggers strikethru their original words published though when they add or update them. In this case, though, he deleted the text entirely as if it was never there. Hmm, I wonder why he would do that?

This has been a long standing issue with Dave, and it's lead to some interesting battles in the past -- the most notorious being &lt;a href="http://www.diveintomark.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Mark Pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;'s WinerWatcher (since 404'd, but you can get an overview of the situation at the time from posts by &lt;a href="http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2003/07/11/winerWatcher" rel="nofollow"&gt;Simon Willison&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://jogin.com/weblog/archives/2003/07/15/winer_watcher" rel="nofollow"&gt;Jogin.com&lt;/a&gt;.

And while I could be wrong on this, I believe that NetNewsWire's &lt;a href="http://ranchero.com/netnewswire/features/htmldifferences.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;show differences&lt;/a&gt; feature was (indirectly) inspired by this very event and WinerWatcher.

(I'm not posting this as an attack on Dave or any such thing -- merely pointing out that the issue you bring up is a very real one that has caused difficulties in the past, and is often worth keeping in mind when reading Scripting News [IMHO].)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Usually bloggers strikethru their original words published though when they add or update them. In this case, though, he deleted the text entirely as if it was never there. Hmm, I wonder why he would do that?</p>
<p>This has been a long standing issue with Dave, and it&#8217;s lead to some interesting battles in the past &#8212; the most notorious being <a href="http://www.diveintomark.org/">Mark Pilgrim</a>&#8217;s WinerWatcher (since 404&#8242;d, but you can get an overview of the situation at the time from posts by <a href="http://simon.incutio.com/archive/2003/07/11/winerWatcher">Simon Willison</a> and <a href="http://jogin.com/weblog/archives/2003/07/15/winer_watcher">Jogin.com</a>.</p>
<p>And while I could be wrong on this, I believe that NetNewsWire&#8217;s <a href="http://ranchero.com/netnewswire/features/htmldifferences.php">show differences</a> feature was (indirectly) inspired by this very event and WinerWatcher.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m not posting this as an attack on Dave or any such thing &#8212; merely pointing out that the issue you bring up is a very real one that has caused difficulties in the past, and is often worth keeping in mind when reading Scripting News [IMHO].)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
