<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Artificial Intelligence search &#8220;working beta&#8221; too dumb to find any search results, but it has a patent pending?</title>
	<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/</link>
	<description>Technology, music, video, art, news, reviews and muse on the web</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5636</link>
		<author>Lestat</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 17:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5636</guid>
		<description>Um, what happened to "Give it up, I am not even reading your posted stuff now " ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, what happened to &#8220;Give it up, I am not even reading your posted stuff now &#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Seek</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5527</link>
		<author>Sir Seek</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5527</guid>
		<description>Well you are obviously not internet literate, I cannot have the same control with paid hosting that I do with my own server. I cannot control the firewall on paid hosting, I cannot control the robots.txt and many hosting companies make it so that search engines are not spidering every page. There is no use talking to you as you just want to be mean. You think you know everything, yet you don't know enough about the internet...

I explained the search engine was beta, and wanted feedback, not to be told it is stupid and lacks content, I know it doesnt have lots of links yet, DUH IT'S BRAND NEW AND BETA!

I even asked you to delete this crap, yet you just wish to insult me.

WHAT DID YOU EXPECT?

PLEASE AGAIN, DELETE THIS BLOG!

BTW, I HAVE PAID HOSTING ACCOUNTS, I CAN'T AFFORD ANYMORE RIGHT NOW MR. KNOWITALL...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you are obviously not internet literate, I cannot have the same control with paid hosting that I do with my own server. I cannot control the firewall on paid hosting, I cannot control the robots.txt and many hosting companies make it so that search engines are not spidering every page. There is no use talking to you as you just want to be mean. You think you know everything, yet you don&#8217;t know enough about the internet&#8230;</p>
<p>I explained the search engine was beta, and wanted feedback, not to be told it is stupid and lacks content, I know it doesnt have lots of links yet, DUH IT&#8217;S BRAND NEW AND BETA!</p>
<p>I even asked you to delete this crap, yet you just wish to insult me.</p>
<p>WHAT DID YOU EXPECT?</p>
<p>PLEASE AGAIN, DELETE THIS BLOG!</p>
<p>BTW, I HAVE PAID HOSTING ACCOUNTS, I CAN&#8217;T AFFORD ANYMORE RIGHT NOW MR. KNOWITALL&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make You Go Hmm:  &#187; Wondir-ing how to respond to feedback?</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5426</link>
		<author>Make You Go Hmm:  &#187; Wondir-ing how to respond to feedback?</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5426</guid>
		<description>[...] le do handle this professionally but there have been a couple who do not handle this well, like this guy who started out being receptive to the feedback and later turned ugly. At one point he b [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] le do handle this professionally but there have been a couple who do not handle this well, like this guy who started out being receptive to the feedback and later turned ugly. At one point he b [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Dont Care</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5046</link>
		<author>Sir Dont Care</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 03:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5046</guid>
		<description>YOU ARE A GOOF! BUT YOU ALREADY KNEW THAT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU ARE A GOOF! BUT YOU ALREADY KNEW THAT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5024</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5024</guid>
		<description>Sir Weak is still here? Thought you were GONE. We haven't changed any of your text, we just removed your spam above (and below as well). 

So that explains why sirseek.com searches are so slowwww? You haven't figured out that you can just buy real hosting with an OC3 or better backbone for like $10/month?! Doh! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Weak is still here? Thought you were GONE. We haven&#8217;t changed any of your text, we just removed your spam above (and below as well). </p>
<p>So that explains why sirseek.com searches are so slowwww? You haven&#8217;t figured out that you can just buy real hosting with an OC3 or better backbone for like $10/month?! Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Dont Care</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5021</link>
		<author>Sir Dont Care</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 22:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-5021</guid>
		<description>Give it up, I am not even reading your posted stuff now (YAWN, IM BORED). Please stop changing some of the text that I post, who knows what I have actually posted here now!

LOL, I am so glad people like you don't want to use my sites, it is people like you that would only drive a webmaster insane!

I peeked at your last post, I am slow because I do not have the $50,000 per year for dual T3 internet access, GOOF!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give it up, I am not even reading your posted stuff now (YAWN, IM BORED). Please stop changing some of the text that I post, who knows what I have actually posted here now!</p>
<p>LOL, I am so glad people like you don&#8217;t want to use my sites, it is people like you that would only drive a webmaster insane!</p>
<p>I peeked at your last post, I am slow because I do not have the $50,000 per year for dual T3 internet access, GOOF!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lestat</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4949</link>
		<author>Lestat</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4949</guid>
		<description>I would agree that the engine is quite hard on the eyes. After trying 1 search, it took well over 20 seconds (I couldn't wait to close the window and get on with my day).

As far as anything patentable, I'm not quite sure I see what would be patentable.

I'm not quite sure what SirSeek is upset about. It looks as if the original blog entry was a critique and not a flame. As a matter of fact, after searching on "TDavid" myself, it would seem that his sites and many, many articles and blog entries that TDavid doesn't realy have the time to intentionaly flame someone. Maybe SirSeek should spend more time in development to improve on any critques, rather than throwing tantrums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree that the engine is quite hard on the eyes. After trying 1 search, it took well over 20 seconds (I couldn&#8217;t wait to close the window and get on with my day).</p>
<p>As far as anything patentable, I&#8217;m not quite sure I see what would be patentable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what SirSeek is upset about. It looks as if the original blog entry was a critique and not a flame. As a matter of fact, after searching on &#8220;TDavid&#8221; myself, it would seem that his sites and many, many articles and blog entries that TDavid doesn&#8217;t realy have the time to intentionaly flame someone. Maybe SirSeek should spend more time in development to improve on any critques, rather than throwing tantrums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4947</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>Sir Weak - you and your company got all the attention you likely will ever get in this post, so good riddance and don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

I love America, the flag, the colors (just not the way they were used on sirseek.com), and a little something called the First Amendment. I suggest you go get "bizzy" and study that before lamely threatening me. As for this blog being 'useless'? Hey, the same First Amendment entitles &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; to that &lt;b&gt;opinion&lt;/b&gt; so thank you for the feedback. Go start a blog, start 100 blogs, whatever turns you on, and if you actually do something innovative, useful and/or new &lt;i&gt;that actually works&lt;/i&gt;, I'll have plenty of good things to say about it.

It's really not that complicated a formula to follow. Ok, maybe for you, Sir Weak. Maybe for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Weak - you and your company got all the attention you likely will ever get in this post, so good riddance and don&#8217;t let the door hit your ass on the way out.</p>
<p>I love America, the flag, the colors (just not the way they were used on sirseek.com), and a little something called the First Amendment. I suggest you go get &#8220;bizzy&#8221; and study that before lamely threatening me. As for this blog being &#8216;useless&#8217;? Hey, the same First Amendment entitles <i>you</i> to that <b>opinion</b> so thank you for the feedback. Go start a blog, start 100 blogs, whatever turns you on, and if you actually do something innovative, useful and/or new <i>that actually works</i>, I&#8217;ll have plenty of good things to say about it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really not that complicated a formula to follow. Ok, maybe for you, Sir Weak. Maybe for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Dont Care</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4917</link>
		<author>Sir Dont Care</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4917</guid>
		<description>Well glad that I least got some attention from you and had you try it.

No matter what color I made things, I am sure you would not like it. Right now the color scheme is that of the United States (American) flag (which I bet you cannot stand the colors for US flag's design either).

Thanks for the "webway ride" and bashings, I am "getting off" on the next "stop" so I bid you farewell...

BTW, what you called spam was a incomplete (I have over 40 sites, only listed a small handful) list of the sites that keep me bizzy, proving what makes SirSeek.com's progress slow (was related to my discussion). You are a rude person (unfortunately anyone can make a blog) and now throwing out illegal slander that suggests I am an illegal spammer. How would you like me to make blogs and forum postings about your site being a spamming website? I bet you wouldn't like it because you couldn't delete it (like me in this situation)...

I SUGGEST YOU DELETE THIS ENTIRE USELESS WEBLOG!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well glad that I least got some attention from you and had you try it.</p>
<p>No matter what color I made things, I am sure you would not like it. Right now the color scheme is that of the United States (American) flag (which I bet you cannot stand the colors for US flag&#8217;s design either).</p>
<p>Thanks for the &#8220;webway ride&#8221; and bashings, I am &#8220;getting off&#8221; on the next &#8220;stop&#8221; so I bid you farewell&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, what you called spam was a incomplete (I have over 40 sites, only listed a small handful) list of the sites that keep me bizzy, proving what makes SirSeek.com&#8217;s progress slow (was related to my discussion). You are a rude person (unfortunately anyone can make a blog) and now throwing out illegal slander that suggests I am an illegal spammer. How would you like me to make blogs and forum postings about your site being a spamming website? I bet you wouldn&#8217;t like it because you couldn&#8217;t delete it (like me in this situation)&#8230;</p>
<p>I SUGGEST YOU DELETE THIS ENTIRE USELESS WEBLOG!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4569</link>
		<author>TDavid</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20041231/1296/#comment-4569</guid>
		<description>Sir Seek - first of all, no, I didn't write this *one* blog entry to "ruin Sir Seek." Please don't be so self-important. In fact, in your case, as people can read above, you specifically &lt;i&gt;sought my feedback&lt;/i&gt;. Don't bitch and moan about my commentary just because it isn't glowing, flowery and to your specific liking.

Just checked out your new design and spent all of five minutes there. At least for the moment I'll spare SirSeek.com from any further embarassment by making another blog entry &lt;i&gt;with an updated review and opinion&lt;/i&gt;. Sorry, but I'm still a long ways from being inspired and/or impressed and I didn't see much of anything at Sir Seek that was innovative, new and/or useful.

And it's still producing errors like this:
&lt;b&gt;Oops (sorry), experiencing tech prob with our web ranker&lt;/b&gt;

The design is still hard on the eyes -- red hyperlinks on a bright, blue background in the header or white background in the body with red text, ouch. The text size, layout and colors are all just ... wrong. Spend a few bones and hire a professional designer to do some simple, yet strategic modifications and it will make a ton of difference. But wait, before you do that, you need to fix the search functionality which is dreadfully SLOWWWWWW. Searches took several twenty seconds and people won't wait this long. Use Google as a benchmark and see how long searches take there. My guess is your searches are being done in real time. Hint: use caching. The results seem like something I could get using a program like php-dig and a homemade spider. You might be a one-man operation, Sir Seek, but you shouldn't produce a product like this that looks like it came from a one man operation.

I still cannot fathom what is worth &lt;i&gt;patenting&lt;/i&gt; here which drove most of my scrutiny, but whatever.

And BTW, please do *NOT* spam the comments area with a bunch of URLs to your other programs (one &lt;i&gt;relevant&lt;/i&gt; link would be acceptable) because they will just be removed before ever seeing the light of day. Not only is this tacky, but we &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; nix this type of activity because it isn't relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir Seek - first of all, no, I didn&#8217;t write this *one* blog entry to &#8220;ruin Sir Seek.&#8221; Please don&#8217;t be so self-important. In fact, in your case, as people can read above, you specifically <i>sought my feedback</i>. Don&#8217;t bitch and moan about my commentary just because it isn&#8217;t glowing, flowery and to your specific liking.</p>
<p>Just checked out your new design and spent all of five minutes there. At least for the moment I&#8217;ll spare SirSeek.com from any further embarassment by making another blog entry <i>with an updated review and opinion</i>. Sorry, but I&#8217;m still a long ways from being inspired and/or impressed and I didn&#8217;t see much of anything at Sir Seek that was innovative, new and/or useful.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s still producing errors like this:<br />
<b>Oops (sorry), experiencing tech prob with our web ranker</b></p>
<p>The design is still hard on the eyes &#8212; red hyperlinks on a bright, blue background in the header or white background in the body with red text, ouch. The text size, layout and colors are all just &#8230; wrong. Spend a few bones and hire a professional designer to do some simple, yet strategic modifications and it will make a ton of difference. But wait, before you do that, you need to fix the search functionality which is dreadfully SLOWWWWWW. Searches took several twenty seconds and people won&#8217;t wait this long. Use Google as a benchmark and see how long searches take there. My guess is your searches are being done in real time. Hint: use caching. The results seem like something I could get using a program like php-dig and a homemade spider. You might be a one-man operation, Sir Seek, but you shouldn&#8217;t produce a product like this that looks like it came from a one man operation.</p>
<p>I still cannot fathom what is worth <i>patenting</i> here which drove most of my scrutiny, but whatever.</p>
<p>And BTW, please do *NOT* spam the comments area with a bunch of URLs to your other programs (one <i>relevant</i> link would be acceptable) because they will just be removed before ever seeing the light of day. Not only is this tacky, but we <i>will</i> nix this type of activity because it isn&#8217;t relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
