type in your query to search makeyougohmm
Things that ... make you go hmmtechnology music video art news reviews and muse on the web

April 12, 2004

Forbes takes an early look at Google’s Gmail

default — by TDavid @ 7:32 pm PST
New! F = please no more posts like thisD = not among your best stuffC = average postB = good post, I liked itA = great post, please create more like this (Hmm, no ratings yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

The one gigabyte of storage that some on the internet thought might be an April’s fools joke has been confirmed. Hats off to Forbes for the first detailed media review (that I’ve seen anyway) of Google’s new GMail:

Another feature that makes it easy to re-trace the steps in an e-mail exchange: say you need to remember a few action items sent by e-mail from the boss. Once you find the one of the e-mail messages that is part of that exchange, Gmail displays it with related messages in the window. Gmail calls these exchanges “conversations.” And clicking on one expands it so that more than one relevant message is displayed at a time. A link at the right of the screen says “expand all,” and it expands all the messages that are part of a conversation.

Sounds like there are some good features, especially the search, which is a given with Google’s involvement. The privacy angle with the ads are of what’s a real concern and the article addresses that also:

The first night we started using Gmail, late April 9, we saw the text ads, which were nearly identical to the text ads you’re used to seeing in on the right side of the screen after a Web search at Google.com. As of this morning, we noticed no text ads at all.

I have to wonder on the issue of my email contents being scanned by a machine for keywords to display ads. I mean, really, this might still scare people away because if a computer is reading the mail and the mail is being stored offsite, this could be a privacy concern. Would be nice to see them encrypt that email end to end, but then that would screw up their ad targeting service. Perhaps they could only target ads based on the subject field or once the email is created? Hmm …

Related Posts

RSS Feed comments for this post 3 Comments »

  1. What I don’t like about Gmail is that it scans all emails, and saves them on its own servers.

    That means it’s also going to scan my incoming mail from Gmail users, and I don’t want that, either. To stop it, I’ve set up a spam filter that sends mails from gmail users to a folder, from where my email client (Mac mail) lets me ‘bounce’ the mail to the sender.

    I’m still looking for a Mac e-mail client that will let me do that hands-free (Entourage doesn’t either), so if you know of one that does, please drop by my site and use the ‘contact’ link to let me know. TIA. http://www.tude.com/

    Comment by Hal Pawluk — April 14, 2004 @ 12:05 pm PST

  2. This is no different than scanning for spam or viruses, which every ISP does (and many client software packages do). And after all. In each case, a computer parses incoming e-mail text.

    Comment by Adam — April 18, 2004 @ 7:18 pm PST

  3. It is different. A virus scan does not scan for meaningful words, then save everything.

    Comment by Hal Pawluk — August 4, 2004 @ 11:45 pm PST


TrackBack URI: http://www.makeyougohmm.com/20040412/677/trackback/

Leave a comment


By leaving a comment you consent to the Official Hmm Comment Policy

Return Home


Copyright 2003-2008 KMR Enterprises All Rights Reserved